HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
The HiSilicon Kirin 710 and Kirin 970 are two processors that are commonly used in smartphones and other devices. While they both offer impressive performance, there are some specifications that set them apart.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, this processor boasts a combination of Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A53 cores. It has 4 high-performance cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 4 efficiency cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is designed to handle a wide range of tasks efficiently. It utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set and features a 12 nm lithography, which helps to optimize power consumption and improve performance. The HiSilicon Kirin 710 has 5500 million transistors and operates with a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 takes performance to the next level. It also employs a combination of Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A53 cores, but with higher clock speeds. It has 4 high-performance cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 4 efficiency cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. The Kirin 970, similar to the Kirin 710, utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set. However, it features a more advanced 10 nm lithography, which allows for increased performance and power efficiency. Additionally, the Kirin 970 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI capabilities and enables faster and more efficient processing of neural network tasks. The Kirin 970 has the same number of transistors as the Kirin 710, but operates with a slightly higher TDP of 9 Watts.
In summary, while both processors offer commendable performance, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 surpasses the Kirin 710 in several aspects. It has higher clock speeds, a more advanced lithography, and includes a Neural Processing Unit for improved AI capabilities. However, it's important to note that both processors are well-suited for everyday tasks and can handle a variety of applications with ease.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, this processor boasts a combination of Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A53 cores. It has 4 high-performance cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 4 efficiency cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is designed to handle a wide range of tasks efficiently. It utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set and features a 12 nm lithography, which helps to optimize power consumption and improve performance. The HiSilicon Kirin 710 has 5500 million transistors and operates with a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 takes performance to the next level. It also employs a combination of Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A53 cores, but with higher clock speeds. It has 4 high-performance cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 4 efficiency cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. The Kirin 970, similar to the Kirin 710, utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set. However, it features a more advanced 10 nm lithography, which allows for increased performance and power efficiency. Additionally, the Kirin 970 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI capabilities and enables faster and more efficient processing of neural network tasks. The Kirin 970 has the same number of transistors as the Kirin 710, but operates with a slightly higher TDP of 9 Watts.
In summary, while both processors offer commendable performance, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 surpasses the Kirin 710 in several aspects. It has higher clock speeds, a more advanced lithography, and includes a Neural Processing Unit for improved AI capabilities. However, it's important to note that both processors are well-suited for everyday tasks and can handle a variety of applications with ease.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 5500 million | 5500 million |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 9 Watt |
| Neural Processing | HiSilicon NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G72 MP12 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 12 |
| Shaders | 64 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2340x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 3 | 2017 September |
| Partnumber | Hi6260 | Hi3670 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs MediaTek Helio G96
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7360
4
HiSilicon Kirin 9010 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
5
MediaTek Dimensity 7020 vs MediaTek Helio G36
6
Unisoc T820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
7
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
8
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
10
Google Tensor G4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888