MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
The MediaTek Dimensity 800U and the MediaTek Dimensity 900 are both powerful processors, but they have some key differences in their specifications.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 800U, it features an architecture of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers efficient multitasking and smooth performance. It also utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm, which ensures power efficiency. Furthermore, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U comes equipped with an NPU for enhanced neural processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 boasts an architecture of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Dimensity 800U, it also has a total of 8 cores, promoting seamless multitasking. However, the Dimensity 900 stands out with its advanced lithography of 6 nm, which offers improved power efficiency compared to its counterpart. Additionally, it features a high number of transistors, reaching up to 10,000 million, indicating a high level of performance. The Dimensity 900 also has a TDP of 10 Watt, showcasing its power usage capabilities. Finally, it includes an NPU for efficient neural processing tasks.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U and the MediaTek Dimensity 900 both offer impressive specifications. However, the Dimensity 900 sets itself apart with its superior lithography, higher number of transistors, and lower TDP. These enhancements translate to improved power efficiency and performance in comparison to the Dimensity 800U. Both processors utilize a combination of Cortex-A78 and Cortex-A55 cores, ensuring efficient multitasking capabilities. Lastly, the inclusion of NPUs on both processors enhances their neural processing capabilities, making them suitable for tasks that require artificial intelligence and machine learning.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 800U, it features an architecture of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers efficient multitasking and smooth performance. It also utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm, which ensures power efficiency. Furthermore, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U comes equipped with an NPU for enhanced neural processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 boasts an architecture of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Dimensity 800U, it also has a total of 8 cores, promoting seamless multitasking. However, the Dimensity 900 stands out with its advanced lithography of 6 nm, which offers improved power efficiency compared to its counterpart. Additionally, it features a high number of transistors, reaching up to 10,000 million, indicating a high level of performance. The Dimensity 900 also has a TDP of 10 Watt, showcasing its power usage capabilities. Finally, it includes an NPU for efficient neural processing tasks.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U and the MediaTek Dimensity 900 both offer impressive specifications. However, the Dimensity 900 sets itself apart with its superior lithography, higher number of transistors, and lower TDP. These enhancements translate to improved power efficiency and performance in comparison to the Dimensity 800U. Both processors utilize a combination of Cortex-A78 and Cortex-A55 cores, ensuring efficient multitasking capabilities. Lastly, the inclusion of NPUs on both processors enhances their neural processing capabilities, making them suitable for tasks that require artificial intelligence and machine learning.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 10000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 4 |
Shaders | 48 | 64 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2021 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T | MT6877 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
2
Google Tensor G1 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
4
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
5
MediaTek Helio G37 vs Apple A11 Bionic
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Samsung Exynos 7870
9
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Google Tensor G2
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685