Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T710
VS
The Unisoc Tiger T710 and the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 4 Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores also running at 1.8 GHz. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a balanced combination of performance and efficiency. Its instruction set is ARMv8.2-A, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of software and applications. Additionally, the Tiger T710 has a lithography of 12 nm, indicating a relatively older manufacturing process.
One notable feature of the Unisoc Tiger T710 is its Dual Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This enhances its ability to handle tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning, providing better performance in those areas.
Moving on to the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it boasts a CPU architecture that includes 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.8 GHz. With comparable core count to its counterpart, the T760 offers improved performance with the use of the more powerful Cortex-A76 architecture. The T760 also shares the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set as the Tiger T710.
One key difference between the two processors is their lithography. The Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G utilizes a more advanced 6 nm lithography, suggesting a potentially better power efficiency and overall performance. In addition, the T760 has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 5 Watts, indicating a relatively low power consumption—beneficial for battery-powered devices.
Though both processors have NPUs, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G does not specify if it has dual NPUs like the Tiger T710. However, it still offers Neural Processing capabilities.
Overall, while the Unisoc Tiger T710 offers a balanced combination of performance and efficiency, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G takes it a step further with a more advanced lithography and potentially improved power efficiency. Additionally, the T760 benefits from the more powerful Cortex-A76 cores, making it a suitable choice for tasks demanding high performance.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 4 Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores also running at 1.8 GHz. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a balanced combination of performance and efficiency. Its instruction set is ARMv8.2-A, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of software and applications. Additionally, the Tiger T710 has a lithography of 12 nm, indicating a relatively older manufacturing process.
One notable feature of the Unisoc Tiger T710 is its Dual Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This enhances its ability to handle tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning, providing better performance in those areas.
Moving on to the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it boasts a CPU architecture that includes 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.8 GHz. With comparable core count to its counterpart, the T760 offers improved performance with the use of the more powerful Cortex-A76 architecture. The T760 also shares the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set as the Tiger T710.
One key difference between the two processors is their lithography. The Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G utilizes a more advanced 6 nm lithography, suggesting a potentially better power efficiency and overall performance. In addition, the T760 has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 5 Watts, indicating a relatively low power consumption—beneficial for battery-powered devices.
Though both processors have NPUs, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G does not specify if it has dual NPUs like the Tiger T710. However, it still offers Neural Processing capabilities.
Overall, while the Unisoc Tiger T710 offers a balanced combination of performance and efficiency, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G takes it a step further with a more advanced lithography and potentially improved power efficiency. Additionally, the T760 benefits from the more powerful Cortex-A76 cores, making it a suitable choice for tasks demanding high performance.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 5 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Execution units | 6 | |
| Shaders | 96 | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 24MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.7 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 February | 2019 |
| Partnumber | T760 | T710 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
3
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
4
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Apple M4 (iPad)
6
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
7
Samsung Exynos 7885 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020
8
Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
10
MediaTek Helio A25 vs Samsung Exynos 9825