Unisoc SC9832E vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
The Unisoc SC9832E and Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G are two processors that vary in their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it has a total of 4 CPU cores with a 1.4 GHz clock speed using the Cortex-A53 architecture. It uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of this processor is 7 Watt. These specifications suggest that the SC9832E is not a high-performance processor, but it may be suitable for low-power and basic applications.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G offers a more advanced set of specifications. It features 8 CPU cores divided into two parts. The first part consists of 4 Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.2 GHz, and the second part comprises 4 Cortex-A55 cores operating at 1.8 GHz. This processor utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, making it more advanced than the SC9832E. The T760 5G is built on a 6 nm lithography, which indicates improved power efficiency. Moreover, it has a lower TDP of 5 Watt, meaning it consumes less power during operation. Additionally, the T760 5G incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which accelerates AI-related tasks.
In summary, while the Unisoc SC9832E is a basic processor with 4 cores and a clock speed of 1.4 GHz, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G offers a more powerful performance with 8 cores, a faster clock speed, advanced architecture, and a neural processing unit. The T760 5G also benefits from a more efficient manufacturing process with a smaller lithography and lower TDP. Therefore, if high-performance and AI-related tasks are a priority, the Tanggula T760 5G would be the better choice compared to the SC9832E.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it has a total of 4 CPU cores with a 1.4 GHz clock speed using the Cortex-A53 architecture. It uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of this processor is 7 Watt. These specifications suggest that the SC9832E is not a high-performance processor, but it may be suitable for low-power and basic applications.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G offers a more advanced set of specifications. It features 8 CPU cores divided into two parts. The first part consists of 4 Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.2 GHz, and the second part comprises 4 Cortex-A55 cores operating at 1.8 GHz. This processor utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, making it more advanced than the SC9832E. The T760 5G is built on a 6 nm lithography, which indicates improved power efficiency. Moreover, it has a lower TDP of 5 Watt, meaning it consumes less power during operation. Additionally, the T760 5G incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which accelerates AI-related tasks.
In summary, while the Unisoc SC9832E is a basic processor with 4 cores and a clock speed of 1.4 GHz, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G offers a more powerful performance with 8 cores, a faster clock speed, advanced architecture, and a neural processing unit. The T760 5G also benefits from a more efficient manufacturing process with a smaller lithography and lower TDP. Therefore, if high-performance and AI-related tasks are a priority, the Tanggula T760 5G would be the better choice compared to the SC9832E.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 2 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 667 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T820 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 680 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | 6 |
| Shaders | 4 | 96 |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | 2160x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 13MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 | 2021 February |
| Partnumber | T760 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 1480 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300
3
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
7
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
8
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
9
Samsung Exynos 2400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G