HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-A77 (Kryo 585 Prime) 3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A77 (Kryo 585 Gold) 4x 1.80 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 585 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | Qualcomm Hexagon 698 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Adreno 650 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 670 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 2 |
| Shaders | 128 | 512 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 7.5 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 3 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2020 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | Hi6290 | SM8250-AB |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G85 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
2
Apple A13 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
3
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs MediaTek Helio P60
4
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Apple A17 Pro
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
7
Unisoc SC9863A vs Samsung Exynos 990
8
MediaTek Dimensity 9500 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
9
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs MediaTek Helio P95
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3