HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-A77 (Kryo 585 Prime) 3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A77 (Kryo 585 Gold) 4x 1.80 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 585 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | Qualcomm Hexagon 698 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Adreno 650 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 670 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 2 |
| Shaders | 128 | 512 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 7.5 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 3 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2020 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | Hi6290 | SM8250-AB |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
2
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Samsung Exynos 1480
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 9611
4
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
5
HiSilicon Kirin 9020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
6
HiSilicon Kirin 8020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
7
HiSilicon Kirin 9000S vs Unisoc SC7731E
8
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
9
Apple A10X Fusion vs Samsung Exynos 8895
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Samsung Exynos 2200