Unisoc SC9832E vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G

VS
The Unisoc SC9832E and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are two processors with varying specifications. Let's compare them in terms of their CPU cores and architecture, instruction set, lithography, and additional features.

Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it features a 4x 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 architecture. With four cores, this processor can handle a decent amount of tasks simultaneously. Its instruction set is ARMv8-A, allowing it to support the latest software and applications. With a lithography of 28 nm, this processor may not be as power-efficient as processors with a smaller lithography. It has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 7 Watts, which represents the amount of heat generated and dissipated by the processor during operation.

On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G boasts more advanced specifications. It has an architecture of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55, giving it a total of 8 cores. This multi-core setup enables enhanced multitasking and faster processing speed. Its instruction set, ARMv8.2-A, supports newer features and optimizations compared to the SC9832E. With a lithography of 12 nm, this processor is more power-efficient, reducing energy consumption and heat generation. Additionally, the Tanggula T740 5G comes with the added feature of dual Neural Processing Units (NPUs). These NPUs enhance AI (Artificial Intelligence) capabilities, enabling tasks such as facial recognition and voice commands with better accuracy and efficiency.

In summary, the Unisoc SC9832E is a mid-range processor with a 4x 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 architecture, ARMv8-A instruction set, 28 nm lithography, and a TDP of 7 Watts. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G is a more high-end processor featuring an 8-core setup with a combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, ARMv8.2-A instruction set, a 12 nm lithography, and dual Neural Processing Units for improved AI capabilities. Depending on the intended usage, the Tanggula T740 5G would offer better performance and power efficiency compared to the SC9832E.

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture 4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
Number of cores 4 8
Instruction Set ARMv8-A ARMv8.2-A
Lithography 28 nm 12 nm
TDP 7 Watt
Neural Processing Dual NPU

Memory (RAM)

Max amount up to 2 GB up to 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR3 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 667 MHz 1866 MHz

Storage

Storage specification eMMC 5.1 UFS 2.1

Graphics

GPU name Mali-T820 MP1 Imagination PowerVR GM9446
GPU Architecture Midgard Rogue
GPU frequency 680 MHz 800 MHz
Execution units 1
Shaders 4
DirectX 11
OpenCL API 1.2 4.0
OpenGL API ES 3.2 ES 3.2
Vulkan API 1.0 1.1

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution 1440x720 2960x1440@60Hz
Max camera resolution 1x 13MP 1x 64MP
Max Video Capture FullHD@30fps 4K@30fps
Video codec support H.264 (AVC) H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)
VP8
VP9

Wireless

4G network Yes Yes
5G network Yes Yes
Peak Download Speed 0.15 Gbps 1.5 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed 0.05 Gbps 0.75 Gbps
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) 5 (802.11ac)
Bluetooth 4.2 5.0
Satellite navigation BeiDou
GPS
GLONASS
BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS

Supplemental Information

Launch Date 2018 2020 Quarter 1
Partnumber T740, Tiger T7510
Vertical Segment Mobiles Mobiles
Positioning Low-end Mid-end

AnTuTu 10

Total Score
SC9832E
55434
Tanggula T740 5G
220285

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score
SC9832E
98
Tanggula T740 5G
369

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score
SC9832E
455
Tanggula T740 5G
1391