HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs Unisoc SC9863A
When comparing the specifications of the HiSilicon Kirin 930 and Unisoc SC9863A processors, several differences can be observed.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 930, it features an architecture of 4x 2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores and uses the ARMv8-A instruction set. It has a lithography of 28 nm and contains approximately 1,000 million transistors. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the Kirin 930 is 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A processor utilizes an architecture of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Kirin 930, it also has a total of 8 cores and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This processor has a lithography of 28 nm and a lower TDP of 3 Watts. Additionally, the Unisoc SC9863A features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities for AI and machine learning tasks.
In terms of processing power, the higher clock speeds of the Kirin 930 (2 GHz and 1.5 GHz) suggest that it may offer better performance than the SC9863A (1.6 GHz and 1.2 GHz). However, the Unisoc SC9863A's NPU sets it apart by providing dedicated hardware support for AI-related tasks, which can significantly improve performance in certain applications.
Regarding power efficiency, the lower TDP of the Unisoc SC9863A (3 Watts) indicates that it may consume less power and generate less heat compared to the Kirin 930 (5 Watts). This can be particularly beneficial in mobile devices, where battery life and temperature management are crucial factors.
Both processors are manufactured using the same lithography process of 28 nm, which implies that their overall size and power efficiency might be similar. However, the introduction of the NPU in the Unisoc SC9863A may result in additional circuitry, potentially affecting its total transistor count.
In conclusion, while the HiSilicon Kirin 930 may offer higher clock speeds and potentially greater processing power, the Unisoc SC9863A stands out with its NPU, which can significantly enhance AI-related performance. Additionally, the SC9863A's lower TDP indicates better power efficiency and thermal management. The ultimate choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the target application or device.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 930, it features an architecture of 4x 2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores and uses the ARMv8-A instruction set. It has a lithography of 28 nm and contains approximately 1,000 million transistors. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the Kirin 930 is 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A processor utilizes an architecture of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Kirin 930, it also has a total of 8 cores and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This processor has a lithography of 28 nm and a lower TDP of 3 Watts. Additionally, the Unisoc SC9863A features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities for AI and machine learning tasks.
In terms of processing power, the higher clock speeds of the Kirin 930 (2 GHz and 1.5 GHz) suggest that it may offer better performance than the SC9863A (1.6 GHz and 1.2 GHz). However, the Unisoc SC9863A's NPU sets it apart by providing dedicated hardware support for AI-related tasks, which can significantly improve performance in certain applications.
Regarding power efficiency, the lower TDP of the Unisoc SC9863A (3 Watts) indicates that it may consume less power and generate less heat compared to the Kirin 930 (5 Watts). This can be particularly beneficial in mobile devices, where battery life and temperature management are crucial factors.
Both processors are manufactured using the same lithography process of 28 nm, which implies that their overall size and power efficiency might be similar. However, the introduction of the NPU in the Unisoc SC9863A may result in additional circuitry, potentially affecting its total transistor count.
In conclusion, while the HiSilicon Kirin 930 may offer higher clock speeds and potentially greater processing power, the Unisoc SC9863A stands out with its NPU, which can significantly enhance AI-related performance. Additionally, the SC9863A's lower TDP indicates better power efficiency and thermal management. The ultimate choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the target application or device.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 1000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 3 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T628 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 550 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 128 |
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 Quarter 2 | 2018 November |
Partnumber | Hi3630 | SC9863A |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G70 vs MediaTek Helio P35
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Samsung Exynos 850
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
4
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
5
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Apple A16 Bionic
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
8
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
10
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Apple A14 Bionic