HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Samsung Exynos 2200
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G with Samsung Exynos 2200. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 2.09 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.86 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Number of transistors | 8000 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, HiAI 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 24 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP16 | Xclipse 920 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Samsugn Xclipse |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 555 MHz |
| Execution units | 16 | 3 |
| Shaders | 256 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3360x1440@60Hz | 3840x2160@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VC-1 VP8 VP9 |
AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 7.35 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 3.67 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 4 | 2022 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | S5E9925 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs MediaTek Helio G96
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 vs MediaTek Helio G50
3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3
4
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350
5
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs MediaTek Helio G200
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 1280
8
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
9
Unisoc Tiger T615 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801
10
Google Tensor G4 vs MediaTek Helio A22