HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T616
The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and the Unisoc Tiger T616 are two processors with distinct specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 9000 5G boasts an impressive configuration. It features a 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Tiger T616 comes with a 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 core and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores.
Both processors have 8 cores, however, the Kirin 9000 5G offers a more advanced architecture with a higher clock speed, potentially leading to better performance.
In terms of instruction set, both processors support ARMv8.2-A, ensuring compatibility with modern software and applications.
When it comes to lithography, the Kirin 9000 5G excels with a 5 nm process, which is more advanced than the 12 nm lithography of the Tiger T616. A smaller lithography generally results in better power efficiency and improved performance.
The Kirin 9000 5G also surpasses the Tiger T616 in terms of the number of transistors. With 15300 million transistors, it has a higher transistor count, indicating a more complex and powerful design.
The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the Kirin 9000 5G is significantly lower, rated at 6 Watts compared to the 10 Watt TDP of the Tiger T616. A lower TDP often means less heat generation and improved energy efficiency.
In terms of Neural Processing, the Kirin 9000 5G stands out with its Ascend Lite (2x) and Ascend Tiny (1x) neural processors. These are coupled with the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, potentially leading to better AI performance.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G outshines the Unisoc Tiger T616 in several key areas. It offers a more powerful and advanced CPU configuration, smaller lithography, higher transistor count, lower TDP, and enhanced Neural Processing capabilities. These specifications suggest that the Kirin 9000 5G is likely to provide superior performance and energy efficiency in comparison to the Tiger T616.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 9000 5G boasts an impressive configuration. It features a 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Tiger T616 comes with a 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 core and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores.
Both processors have 8 cores, however, the Kirin 9000 5G offers a more advanced architecture with a higher clock speed, potentially leading to better performance.
In terms of instruction set, both processors support ARMv8.2-A, ensuring compatibility with modern software and applications.
When it comes to lithography, the Kirin 9000 5G excels with a 5 nm process, which is more advanced than the 12 nm lithography of the Tiger T616. A smaller lithography generally results in better power efficiency and improved performance.
The Kirin 9000 5G also surpasses the Tiger T616 in terms of the number of transistors. With 15300 million transistors, it has a higher transistor count, indicating a more complex and powerful design.
The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the Kirin 9000 5G is significantly lower, rated at 6 Watts compared to the 10 Watt TDP of the Tiger T616. A lower TDP often means less heat generation and improved energy efficiency.
In terms of Neural Processing, the Kirin 9000 5G stands out with its Ascend Lite (2x) and Ascend Tiny (1x) neural processors. These are coupled with the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, potentially leading to better AI performance.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G outshines the Unisoc Tiger T616 in several key areas. It offers a more powerful and advanced CPU configuration, smaller lithography, higher transistor count, lower TDP, and enhanced Neural Processing capabilities. These specifications suggest that the Kirin 9000 5G is likely to provide superior performance and energy efficiency in comparison to the Tiger T616.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 5 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 750 MHz |
Execution units | 24 | 1 |
Shaders | 384 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 October | 2021 |
Partnumber | T616 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
2
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
3
MediaTek Helio G25 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
4
MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
5
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Apple A16 Bionic
6
Unisoc SC7731E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
7
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Samsung Exynos 7904
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs Unisoc SC9832E
9
MediaTek Helio G90 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
10
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs HiSilicon Kirin 710