Unisoc SC7731E vs Unisoc SC9832E
The Unisoc SC7731E and Unisoc SC9832E are two processors with various specifications. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC7731E has 4 cores with a speed of 1.3 GHz and utilizes the Cortex-A7 architecture. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9832E also has 4 cores, but with a slightly higher clock speed of 1.4 GHz and employs the Cortex-A53 architecture.
When it comes to the instruction set, the SC7731E utilizes the ARMv7-A instruction set, while the SC9832E uses the more advanced ARMv8-A instruction set. This means that the SC9832E may have some additional features or optimizations compared to the SC7731E.
Both processors have a lithography size of 28 nm, indicating that they are manufactured using the same process technology. The lithography size refers to the size of the transistors on the chip and can affect power efficiency, performance, and heat dissipation.
Lastly, both the SC7731E and SC9832E have a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 watts. The TDP represents the maximum amount of power that the processor is designed to dissipate under typical workloads or usage scenarios.
In conclusion, the Unisoc SC9832E offers a slightly higher clock speed, supports the more advanced ARMv8-A instruction set, and has similar lithography and TDP values compared to the Unisoc SC7731E. Depending on the specific use case and requirements, the SC9832E may provide better performance and efficiency. However, it is essential to consider other factors like pricing, compatibility, and real-world benchmarks before making a decision.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC7731E has 4 cores with a speed of 1.3 GHz and utilizes the Cortex-A7 architecture. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9832E also has 4 cores, but with a slightly higher clock speed of 1.4 GHz and employs the Cortex-A53 architecture.
When it comes to the instruction set, the SC7731E utilizes the ARMv7-A instruction set, while the SC9832E uses the more advanced ARMv8-A instruction set. This means that the SC9832E may have some additional features or optimizations compared to the SC7731E.
Both processors have a lithography size of 28 nm, indicating that they are manufactured using the same process technology. The lithography size refers to the size of the transistors on the chip and can affect power efficiency, performance, and heat dissipation.
Lastly, both the SC7731E and SC9832E have a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 watts. The TDP represents the maximum amount of power that the processor is designed to dissipate under typical workloads or usage scenarios.
In conclusion, the Unisoc SC9832E offers a slightly higher clock speed, supports the more advanced ARMv8-A instruction set, and has similar lithography and TDP values compared to the Unisoc SC7731E. Depending on the specific use case and requirements, the SC9832E may provide better performance and efficiency. However, it is essential to consider other factors like pricing, compatibility, and real-world benchmarks before making a decision.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 | 4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv7-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 7 Watt | 7 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 1 GB | up to 2 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 533 MHz | 667 MHz |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T820 MP1 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 680 MHz |
Execution units | 1 | 1 |
Shaders | 4 | 4 |
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 8MP | 1x 13MP |
Max Video Capture | HD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) | H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.15 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 2 | 2018 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P65 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
2
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs Apple A15 Bionic
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
4
Apple A16 Bionic vs Apple A14 Bionic
5
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Apple A13 Bionic
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
7
Apple A12 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs Samsung Exynos 7904
9
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Apple A17 Pro
10
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Samsung Exynos 9820