Unisoc SC7731E vs Unisoc SC9832E
The Unisoc SC7731E and Unisoc SC9832E are two processors with various specifications. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC7731E has 4 cores with a speed of 1.3 GHz and utilizes the Cortex-A7 architecture. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9832E also has 4 cores, but with a slightly higher clock speed of 1.4 GHz and employs the Cortex-A53 architecture.
When it comes to the instruction set, the SC7731E utilizes the ARMv7-A instruction set, while the SC9832E uses the more advanced ARMv8-A instruction set. This means that the SC9832E may have some additional features or optimizations compared to the SC7731E.
Both processors have a lithography size of 28 nm, indicating that they are manufactured using the same process technology. The lithography size refers to the size of the transistors on the chip and can affect power efficiency, performance, and heat dissipation.
Lastly, both the SC7731E and SC9832E have a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 watts. The TDP represents the maximum amount of power that the processor is designed to dissipate under typical workloads or usage scenarios.
In conclusion, the Unisoc SC9832E offers a slightly higher clock speed, supports the more advanced ARMv8-A instruction set, and has similar lithography and TDP values compared to the Unisoc SC7731E. Depending on the specific use case and requirements, the SC9832E may provide better performance and efficiency. However, it is essential to consider other factors like pricing, compatibility, and real-world benchmarks before making a decision.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC7731E has 4 cores with a speed of 1.3 GHz and utilizes the Cortex-A7 architecture. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9832E also has 4 cores, but with a slightly higher clock speed of 1.4 GHz and employs the Cortex-A53 architecture.
When it comes to the instruction set, the SC7731E utilizes the ARMv7-A instruction set, while the SC9832E uses the more advanced ARMv8-A instruction set. This means that the SC9832E may have some additional features or optimizations compared to the SC7731E.
Both processors have a lithography size of 28 nm, indicating that they are manufactured using the same process technology. The lithography size refers to the size of the transistors on the chip and can affect power efficiency, performance, and heat dissipation.
Lastly, both the SC7731E and SC9832E have a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 watts. The TDP represents the maximum amount of power that the processor is designed to dissipate under typical workloads or usage scenarios.
In conclusion, the Unisoc SC9832E offers a slightly higher clock speed, supports the more advanced ARMv8-A instruction set, and has similar lithography and TDP values compared to the Unisoc SC7731E. Depending on the specific use case and requirements, the SC9832E may provide better performance and efficiency. However, it is essential to consider other factors like pricing, compatibility, and real-world benchmarks before making a decision.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 | 4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv7-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 7 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 1 GB | up to 2 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 |
| Memory frequency | 533 MHz | 667 MHz |
Storage
| Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T820 MP1 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | Mali Midgard |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | 1 |
| Shaders | 4 | 4 |
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | 1440x720 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 8MP | 1x 13MP |
| Max Video Capture | HD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) | H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.15 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 4 (802.11n) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 2 | 2018 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs MediaTek Helio G200
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
4
Apple A10 Fusion vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
5
Apple M1 (iPad) vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
7
Google Tensor G1 vs Apple A17 Pro
8
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs MediaTek Helio G95
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000