MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
The Unisoc Tiger T310 and the MediaTek Dimensity 920 are both powerful processors, but they have some notable differences in their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it features an architecture that consists of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means it has a total of 4 cores, allowing for efficient multitasking. The instruction set is ARMv8.2-A, which ensures compatibility with modern software. With a lithography of 12 nm, it strikes a good balance between performance and power efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts a more advanced architecture. It has 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, resulting in a total of 8 cores. This configuration allows for even greater multitasking capabilities and improved performance. Like the Unisoc Tiger T310, it also uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, its lithography is much smaller at 6 nm, which indicates superior power efficiency.
In terms of power consumption, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) rating of 10 Watt. This means it is designed to operate within a specific power envelope, which can contribute to more efficient use of electricity. Additionally, it is equipped with an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enables AI processing tasks. This can enhance performance in AI-related applications such as voice assistants and image recognition.
While both processors offer impressive specifications, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 appears to have the upper hand in terms of architecture, core count, and power efficiency with its smaller lithography and NPU. However, the Unisoc Tiger T310 may still be a suitable option for those looking for a capable processor with a balance between performance and efficiency.
Overall, the choice between these two processors will depend on specific needs and preferences, whether it be focused on power efficiency, multitasking capabilities, or AI processing power.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it features an architecture that consists of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means it has a total of 4 cores, allowing for efficient multitasking. The instruction set is ARMv8.2-A, which ensures compatibility with modern software. With a lithography of 12 nm, it strikes a good balance between performance and power efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts a more advanced architecture. It has 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, resulting in a total of 8 cores. This configuration allows for even greater multitasking capabilities and improved performance. Like the Unisoc Tiger T310, it also uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, its lithography is much smaller at 6 nm, which indicates superior power efficiency.
In terms of power consumption, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) rating of 10 Watt. This means it is designed to operate within a specific power envelope, which can contribute to more efficient use of electricity. Additionally, it is equipped with an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enables AI processing tasks. This can enhance performance in AI-related applications such as voice assistants and image recognition.
While both processors offer impressive specifications, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 appears to have the upper hand in terms of architecture, core count, and power efficiency with its smaller lithography and NPU. However, the Unisoc Tiger T310 may still be a suitable option for those looking for a capable processor with a balance between performance and efficiency.
Overall, the choice between these two processors will depend on specific needs and preferences, whether it be focused on power efficiency, multitasking capabilities, or AI processing power.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1333 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 660 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 96 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 10 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1600x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2019 April |
Partnumber | MT6877T | T310 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
2
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
3
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
4
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs Google Tensor G3
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
7
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
9
Samsung Exynos 990 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
10
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs MediaTek Helio P70