Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
VS
The Unisoc Tiger T606 and Tiger T616 are two processors with similar specifications, but with slight differences.
Both processors have 8 cores and use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. They also have the same lithography and TDP, with a 12 nm lithography and a TDP of 10 Watts.
The main difference between the two is in their CPU cores and architecture. The Tiger T606 has two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz, along with six Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.6 GHz. On the other hand, the Tiger T616 has two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at a higher speed of 2.0 GHz, along with six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz.
The increase in clock speed of the Tiger T616's Cortex-A75 cores compared to the Tiger T606's Cortex-A75 cores may result in improved performance and faster processing speeds. However, it is important to note that the Tiger T616's Cortex-A55 cores have a slightly lower clock speed compared to the Tiger T606's Cortex-A55 cores.
In conclusion, the Tiger T616 offers a slight improvement in performance compared to the Tiger T606, thanks to the higher clock speed of its Cortex-A75 cores. However, the clock speed of its Cortex-A55 cores is slightly lower compared to the Tiger T606. Depending on the specific workload and usage scenario, users may experience varying levels of performance and efficiency between the two processors.
Both processors have 8 cores and use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. They also have the same lithography and TDP, with a 12 nm lithography and a TDP of 10 Watts.
The main difference between the two is in their CPU cores and architecture. The Tiger T606 has two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz, along with six Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.6 GHz. On the other hand, the Tiger T616 has two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at a higher speed of 2.0 GHz, along with six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz.
The increase in clock speed of the Tiger T616's Cortex-A75 cores compared to the Tiger T606's Cortex-A75 cores may result in improved performance and faster processing speeds. However, it is important to note that the Tiger T616's Cortex-A55 cores have a slightly lower clock speed compared to the Tiger T606's Cortex-A55 cores.
In conclusion, the Tiger T616 offers a slight improvement in performance compared to the Tiger T606, thanks to the higher clock speed of its Cortex-A75 cores. However, the clock speed of its Cortex-A55 cores is slightly lower compared to the Tiger T606. Depending on the specific workload and usage scenario, users may experience varying levels of performance and efficiency between the two processors.
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1600 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | 1 |
| Shaders | 16 | 16 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1600x900@90Hz | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 October | 2021 |
| Partnumber | T606 | T616 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P60 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Apple A16 Bionic
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
5
Google Tensor G1 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
6
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
8
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Unisoc SC9863A
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
10
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1