MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
The Unisoc Tiger T612 and MediaTek Dimensity 930 processors have their own unique specifications that set them apart from each other.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T612, it has a total of eight cores with a specific architecture. The processor consists of two Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also running at 1.8 GHz. The instruction set for this processor is ARMv8.2-A, and it has a lithography of 12 nm. In terms of power consumption, it has a TDP (thermal design power) of 10 watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 also has eight cores but with a different architecture. It features two Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T612, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it stands out with its smaller 6 nm lithography. Additionally, the Dimensity 930 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced artificial intelligence capabilities. It also has a TDP of 10 watts.
When comparing the two processors, it's evident that the MediaTek Dimensity 930 has a more advanced architecture with Cortex-A78 cores. This suggests better processing power and potentially improved performance. The smaller lithography of 6 nm is also noteworthy as it indicates better power efficiency and potentially lower heat generation. Additionally, the inclusion of an NPU in the Dimensity 930 further enhances its AI capabilities.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 has a larger lithography of 12 nm, which may result in slightly higher power consumption and less power efficiency compared to the Dimensity 930.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 appears to be a more powerful and efficient processor with its advanced architecture, smaller lithography, and integrated NPU. However, specific performance benchmarks and real-world usage scenarios would be needed to make a definitive judgment on which processor performs better in various tasks.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T612, it has a total of eight cores with a specific architecture. The processor consists of two Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also running at 1.8 GHz. The instruction set for this processor is ARMv8.2-A, and it has a lithography of 12 nm. In terms of power consumption, it has a TDP (thermal design power) of 10 watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 also has eight cores but with a different architecture. It features two Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T612, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it stands out with its smaller 6 nm lithography. Additionally, the Dimensity 930 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced artificial intelligence capabilities. It also has a TDP of 10 watts.
When comparing the two processors, it's evident that the MediaTek Dimensity 930 has a more advanced architecture with Cortex-A78 cores. This suggests better processing power and potentially improved performance. The smaller lithography of 6 nm is also noteworthy as it indicates better power efficiency and potentially lower heat generation. Additionally, the inclusion of an NPU in the Dimensity 930 further enhances its AI capabilities.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 has a larger lithography of 12 nm, which may result in slightly higher power consumption and less power efficiency compared to the Dimensity 930.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 appears to be a more powerful and efficient processor with its advanced architecture, smaller lithography, and integrated NPU. However, specific performance benchmarks and real-world usage scenarios would be needed to make a definitive judgment on which processor performs better in various tasks.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 1 | |
Shaders | 16 | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP | 1x 50MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2022 Quarter 3 | 2022 January |
Partnumber | T612 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
6
Samsung Exynos 990 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Apple A12 Bionic
8
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
9
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Samsung Exynos 1280
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685