HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
The HiSilicon Kirin 710 and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are two processors commonly found in smartphones and other electronic devices. While both offer impressive performance, they have some differences in their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it features a CPU architecture consisting of four Cortex-A73 cores operating at 2.2 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores operating at 1.7 GHz. This octa-core design allows for efficient multitasking and smooth performance. The processor is built on a 12 nm lithography process and contains around 5500 million transistors. With a TDP of just 5 Watts, it strikes a good balance between power consumption and performance.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 700, it boasts a slightly different CPU architecture. It features two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. While it has fewer powerful cores compared to the Kirin 710, the additional cores are still capable of handling everyday tasks with ease. The Dimensity 700 is built on a more advanced 7 nm lithography process, which allows for improved power efficiency and performance. Its TDP is slightly higher at 10 Watts, but still within acceptable limits.
In terms of instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8-A architecture, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of software and applications. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 supports version 8.2 of the ARM instruction set, which may offer additional performance optimizations for specific tasks.
Overall, while the HiSilicon Kirin 710 offers a higher clock speed on its cores, the MediaTek Dimensity 700's more advanced lithography process and newer implementation of the ARM instruction set may provide improved power efficiency and performance in certain scenarios. The choice between the two processors ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the device and the intended usage.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it features a CPU architecture consisting of four Cortex-A73 cores operating at 2.2 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores operating at 1.7 GHz. This octa-core design allows for efficient multitasking and smooth performance. The processor is built on a 12 nm lithography process and contains around 5500 million transistors. With a TDP of just 5 Watts, it strikes a good balance between power consumption and performance.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 700, it boasts a slightly different CPU architecture. It features two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. While it has fewer powerful cores compared to the Kirin 710, the additional cores are still capable of handling everyday tasks with ease. The Dimensity 700 is built on a more advanced 7 nm lithography process, which allows for improved power efficiency and performance. Its TDP is slightly higher at 10 Watts, but still within acceptable limits.
In terms of instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8-A architecture, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of software and applications. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 supports version 8.2 of the ARM instruction set, which may offer additional performance optimizations for specific tasks.
Overall, while the HiSilicon Kirin 710 offers a higher clock speed on its cores, the MediaTek Dimensity 700's more advanced lithography process and newer implementation of the ARM instruction set may provide improved power efficiency and performance in certain scenarios. The choice between the two processors ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the device and the intended usage.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 950 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2520x1080@90Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 3 | 2021 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
3
MediaTek Helio A25 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Helio G37
5
MediaTek Helio G90 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
7
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
8
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Google Tensor G3
9
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs MediaTek Helio G88
10
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Samsung Exynos 1280