HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Samsung Exynos 8895
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G with Samsung Exynos 8895. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.3 GHz – Exynos M2 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 3000 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Mali-G71 MP20 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 20 |
| Shaders | 128 | 320 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 3840x2400 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 28MP, 2x 16MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 1 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2017 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | Hi6290 | S5E8895 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Samsung Exynos 7885
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus vs Unisoc Tiger T616
3
MediaTek Dimensity 7020 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020
4
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
5
HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
6
MediaTek Dimensity 6400 vs Apple A18
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400
8
MediaTek Helio G90T vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
9
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs MediaTek MT6737
10
Apple A19 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200