MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
When comparing the Unisoc Tiger T606 to the MediaTek Dimensity 800, the first noticeable difference is in their CPU cores and architecture. The Tiger T606 features a combination of 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. In contrast, the Dimensity 800 has 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores.
Both processors support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which enables performance improvements and better energy efficiency compared to older ARM architectures.
In terms of manufacturing process, the Tiger T606 has a lithography of 12 nm, while the Dimensity 800 boasts a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally indicates more power efficiency and better overall performance.
Interestingly, despite their differences in architecture and lithography, both processors have the same thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts. This suggests that they have similar power consumption and thermal output.
One notable feature in the Dimensity 800 that the Tiger T606 lacks is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). The NPU enables AI and machine learning capabilities, which can enhance various applications such as photography, voice recognition, and gaming.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 appears to offer a more powerful CPU with its Cortex-A76 cores, while the Unisoc Tiger T606 provides a higher number of cores with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 combination. For energy efficiency and more advanced manufacturing process, the Dimensity 800's 7 nm lithography gives it an edge. However, if AI capabilities are required, the Dimensity 800's NPU is a significant advantage over the Tiger T606. Ultimately, the choice between these processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the user or device.
Both processors support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which enables performance improvements and better energy efficiency compared to older ARM architectures.
In terms of manufacturing process, the Tiger T606 has a lithography of 12 nm, while the Dimensity 800 boasts a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally indicates more power efficiency and better overall performance.
Interestingly, despite their differences in architecture and lithography, both processors have the same thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts. This suggests that they have similar power consumption and thermal output.
One notable feature in the Dimensity 800 that the Tiger T606 lacks is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). The NPU enables AI and machine learning capabilities, which can enhance various applications such as photography, voice recognition, and gaming.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 appears to offer a more powerful CPU with its Cortex-A76 cores, while the Unisoc Tiger T606 provides a higher number of cores with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 combination. For energy efficiency and more advanced manufacturing process, the Dimensity 800's 7 nm lithography gives it an edge. However, if AI capabilities are required, the Dimensity 800's NPU is a significant advantage over the Tiger T606. Ultimately, the choice between these processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the user or device.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1600x900@90Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2021 October |
Partnumber | MT6873, MT6873V | T606 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
2
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
3
MediaTek Helio G37 vs Google Tensor G2
4
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Apple A10 Fusion
5
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs MediaTek Helio G70
7
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
8
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs MediaTek Helio G90
10
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Samsung Exynos 7904