HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
When comparing the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and the MediaTek Dimensity 800U processors based on their specifications, several key differences arise.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 985 5G offers a configuration of 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. In contrast, the Dimensity 800U features 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While both processors comprise 8 cores, their composition differs slightly, with the Kirin 985 5G incorporating more Cortex-A76 cores.
Moreover, the instruction set for both processors is ARMv8.2-A, ensuring software compatibility. Additionally, both processors have a lithography of 7 nm, indicating a similar level of manufacturing technology.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 985 5G operates at a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 watts. Conversely, the Dimensity 800U does not specify its TDP, leaving power consumption details unclear.
Another notable difference lies in the neural processing capabilities. The Kirin 985 5G utilizes the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny, both part of the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, for neural processing. On the other hand, the Dimensity 800U incorporates an NPU (Neural Processing Unit) for its neural processing needs.
In summary, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 800U processors share similarities in terms of architecture, number of cores, instruction set, and lithography, they differ in their CPU core configuration, power consumption, and neural processing capabilities. These differences contribute to variations in performance and efficiency, making it important for consumers to thoroughly analyze their specific needs before choosing a device powered by either processor.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 985 5G offers a configuration of 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. In contrast, the Dimensity 800U features 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While both processors comprise 8 cores, their composition differs slightly, with the Kirin 985 5G incorporating more Cortex-A76 cores.
Moreover, the instruction set for both processors is ARMv8.2-A, ensuring software compatibility. Additionally, both processors have a lithography of 7 nm, indicating a similar level of manufacturing technology.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 985 5G operates at a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 watts. Conversely, the Dimensity 800U does not specify its TDP, leaving power consumption details unclear.
Another notable difference lies in the neural processing capabilities. The Kirin 985 5G utilizes the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny, both part of the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, for neural processing. On the other hand, the Dimensity 800U incorporates an NPU (Neural Processing Unit) for its neural processing needs.
In summary, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 800U processors share similarities in terms of architecture, number of cores, instruction set, and lithography, they differ in their CPU core configuration, power consumption, and neural processing capabilities. These differences contribute to variations in performance and efficiency, making it important for consumers to thoroughly analyze their specific needs before choosing a device powered by either processor.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
TDP | 6 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Mali-G57 MP3 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 8 | 3 |
Shaders | 128 | 48 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 4K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2020 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | Hi6290 | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs MediaTek Helio G25
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Unisoc SC9832E
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs MediaTek Helio G70
5
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
6
MediaTek Helio G37 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
7
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
9
MediaTek Helio P35 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
10
Apple A13 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 720