MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
The Unisoc Tiger T700 and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are two processors with distinct specifications. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T700 features a configuration of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 offers 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores and follow the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
Moving on to lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T700 uses a 12 nm process, whereas the MediaTek Dimensity 700 employs a more advanced 7 nm process. The smaller lithography of the Dimensity 700 can lead to better energy efficiency and potentially improved performance.
When it comes to thermal design power (TDP), both processors have a TDP of 10 Watts. This signifies their power consumption and heat dissipation capabilities. Therefore, in terms of power efficiency, they appear to be on par.
From the specifications provided, it can be observed that the MediaTek Dimensity 700 offers a higher clock speed for both its high-performance and efficiency cores compared to the Unisoc Tiger T700. This suggests that the Dimensity 700 might potentially deliver better overall performance, particularly in tasks that require more processing power.
Lastly, it's worth noting that the MediaTek Dimensity 700 utilizes a more advanced manufacturing process with its 7 nm lithography. A smaller node size can result in a more compact and power-efficient chip, which may translate to better battery life and overall device performance.
In summary, while both processors have 8 cores and follow the same instruction set, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 offers a more advanced manufacturing process and higher clock speeds for its CPU cores. This indicates that it could potentially provide better overall performance and energy efficiency compared to the Unisoc Tiger T700.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T700 features a configuration of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 offers 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores and follow the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
Moving on to lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T700 uses a 12 nm process, whereas the MediaTek Dimensity 700 employs a more advanced 7 nm process. The smaller lithography of the Dimensity 700 can lead to better energy efficiency and potentially improved performance.
When it comes to thermal design power (TDP), both processors have a TDP of 10 Watts. This signifies their power consumption and heat dissipation capabilities. Therefore, in terms of power efficiency, they appear to be on par.
From the specifications provided, it can be observed that the MediaTek Dimensity 700 offers a higher clock speed for both its high-performance and efficiency cores compared to the Unisoc Tiger T700. This suggests that the Dimensity 700 might potentially deliver better overall performance, particularly in tasks that require more processing power.
Lastly, it's worth noting that the MediaTek Dimensity 700 utilizes a more advanced manufacturing process with its 7 nm lithography. A smaller node size can result in a more compact and power-efficient chip, which may translate to better battery life and overall device performance.
In summary, while both processors have 8 cores and follow the same instruction set, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 offers a more advanced manufacturing process and higher clock speeds for its CPU cores. This indicates that it could potentially provide better overall performance and energy efficiency compared to the Unisoc Tiger T700.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 2 |
Shaders | 32 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 48MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2021 March |
Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | T700 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
2
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
3
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Samsung Exynos 7870
4
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
5
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
6
MediaTek Helio G90T vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
7
Google Tensor G1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
8
MediaTek Helio G90 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
9
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs MediaTek Helio G96
10
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Samsung Exynos 8895