HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 860. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.96 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Prime) 3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold) 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 6700 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | Qualcomm Hexagon 690 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Adreno 640 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 675 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 3 |
| Shaders | 128 | 768 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 3840x2160 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 5 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 1.24 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2019 Quarter 2 |
| Partnumber | Hi6290 | SM8150-AC |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Xiaomi Xring O1
3
Google Tensor G4 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
5
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
6
MediaTek Helio A22 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6400
7
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs MediaTek MT6737
8
Apple A11 Bionic vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
9
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs MediaTek Helio G200
10
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300