MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
The Unisoc Tiger T310 and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are two processors that offer impressive specifications. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T310 features a 4-core setup with an architecture consisting of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 boasts 8 cores, including 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With double the number of cores and a slightly faster clock speed on the main cores, the Dimensity 700 has a clear advantage in terms of CPU power and multitasking capabilities.
Both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with the latest software and applications. However, the Dimensity 700 takes the lead when it comes to lithography, as it offers a more advanced 7 nm process compared to the Tiger T310's 12 nm lithography. This indicates that the Dimensity 700 is designed to be more power-efficient and could potentially offer better battery life.
Additionally, the Dimensity 700 has a thermal design power (TDP) rating of 10 watts, suggesting that it is optimized for low-power devices. This could make it a suitable choice for smartphones, tablets, and other portable devices.
Overall, while the Unisoc Tiger T310 is a capable processor with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 outperforms it with its higher number of cores, more advanced lithography, and lower TDP rating. If you're looking for a processor that offers superior multitasking capabilities and power efficiency, the Dimensity 700 would be the better choice.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T310 features a 4-core setup with an architecture consisting of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 boasts 8 cores, including 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With double the number of cores and a slightly faster clock speed on the main cores, the Dimensity 700 has a clear advantage in terms of CPU power and multitasking capabilities.
Both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with the latest software and applications. However, the Dimensity 700 takes the lead when it comes to lithography, as it offers a more advanced 7 nm process compared to the Tiger T310's 12 nm lithography. This indicates that the Dimensity 700 is designed to be more power-efficient and could potentially offer better battery life.
Additionally, the Dimensity 700 has a thermal design power (TDP) rating of 10 watts, suggesting that it is optimized for low-power devices. This could make it a suitable choice for smartphones, tablets, and other portable devices.
Overall, while the Unisoc Tiger T310 is a capable processor with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 outperforms it with its higher number of cores, more advanced lithography, and lower TDP rating. If you're looking for a processor that offers superior multitasking capabilities and power efficiency, the Dimensity 700 would be the better choice.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1333 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 660 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 2 |
| Shaders | 32 | 32 |
| DirectX | 12 | 10 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 1600x720 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
| Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2019 April |
| Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | T310 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
3
Apple M2 (iPad) vs MediaTek Helio P60
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
5
Apple A17 Pro vs Unisoc Tiger T612
6
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
7
Samsung Exynos 2400e vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
8
MediaTek Helio G50 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
9
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
10
Unisoc SC9832E vs MediaTek MT6739