MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
The Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are both processors used in mobile devices. Let's compare their specifications to determine their differences.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Tanggula T740 5G features 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 700 has 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, also summing up to 8 cores. Both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
When it comes to lithography, the Tanggula T740 5G has a 12 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 700 boasts a smaller 7 nm lithography. This indicates that the Dimensity 700 is manufactured using a more advanced and efficient process, potentially resulting in better power efficiency and performance.
The Tanggula T740 5G features a Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), enabling it to handle artificial intelligence tasks efficiently. However, the Dimensity 700 does not have this feature specified.
Additionally, the Dimensity 700 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts. TDP refers to the amount of power a processor dissipates under normal usage conditions. Unfortunately, the TDP for the Tanggula T740 5G is not provided in the specifications.
Considering these specifications, we can conclude that the MediaTek Dimensity 700 holds a few advantages over the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G. The Dimensity 700's smaller lithography, higher clock frequency on its Cortex-A76 cores, and lower TDP suggest that it may offer better power efficiency and potentially higher performance compared to the Tanggula T740 5G. However, the Tanggula T740 5G stands out with its Dual NPU, which could provide superior AI processing capabilities for certain applications.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device or system they will be used in.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Tanggula T740 5G features 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 700 has 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, also summing up to 8 cores. Both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
When it comes to lithography, the Tanggula T740 5G has a 12 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 700 boasts a smaller 7 nm lithography. This indicates that the Dimensity 700 is manufactured using a more advanced and efficient process, potentially resulting in better power efficiency and performance.
The Tanggula T740 5G features a Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), enabling it to handle artificial intelligence tasks efficiently. However, the Dimensity 700 does not have this feature specified.
Additionally, the Dimensity 700 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts. TDP refers to the amount of power a processor dissipates under normal usage conditions. Unfortunately, the TDP for the Tanggula T740 5G is not provided in the specifications.
Considering these specifications, we can conclude that the MediaTek Dimensity 700 holds a few advantages over the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G. The Dimensity 700's smaller lithography, higher clock frequency on its Cortex-A76 cores, and lower TDP suggest that it may offer better power efficiency and potentially higher performance compared to the Tanggula T740 5G. However, the Tanggula T740 5G stands out with its Dual NPU, which could provide superior AI processing capabilities for certain applications.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device or system they will be used in.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | |
Shaders | 32 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2960x1440@60Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 64MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.75 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2020 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | T740, Tiger T7510 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 980
2
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Samsung Exynos 1330
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
5
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Unisoc SC9832E
6
Google Tensor G1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
7
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Samsung Exynos 7904
8
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Samsung Exynos 7870
9
MediaTek Helio G90T vs Unisoc Tiger T310
10
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970