MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
The Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 800U are two processors that offer distinct specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it features 8 cores with an architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. This processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is built on a 6nm lithography. With a TDP of 5 Watts, it is designed to offer efficient power consumption. The Tanggula T760 5G also boasts a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced performance in AI-related tasks.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U also has 8 cores, but its architecture is comprised of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. Similar to the Tanggula T760 5G, it uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it is manufactured on a 7nm lithography, slightly larger than the Tanggula T760 5G. Additionally, it comes equipped with its own NPU for efficient neural processing capabilities.
In terms of core configuration, the Tanggula T760 5G has a more balanced distribution with equal numbers of high-performance cores (Cortex-A76) and power-efficient cores (Cortex-A55). The Dimensity 800U, on the other hand, prioritizes higher clock speeds with its 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, potentially offering better single-threaded performance.
While both processors support 5G connectivity, the Tanggula T760 5G has not disclosed the clock speeds of its CPU cores, providing limited information for a comprehensive comparison. However, one notable difference lies in the lithography, where the Tanggula T760 5G has a slight advantage with its 6nm process compared to the Dimensity 800U's 7nm. A smaller lithography can indicate better power efficiency and potentially improved performance.
Both processors incorporate NPUs, indicating their focus on AI-related tasks. However, without specific details on the NPUs, it is difficult to make a direct comparison in terms of their capabilities and efficiency.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 800U share similarities such as 8 cores, ARMv8.2-A instruction set, and NPUs, they differ in key aspects such as CPU core architecture, lithography, and clock speeds. Further analysis is required to determine their actual performance and power efficiency.
Starting with the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it features 8 cores with an architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. This processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is built on a 6nm lithography. With a TDP of 5 Watts, it is designed to offer efficient power consumption. The Tanggula T760 5G also boasts a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced performance in AI-related tasks.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U also has 8 cores, but its architecture is comprised of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. Similar to the Tanggula T760 5G, it uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it is manufactured on a 7nm lithography, slightly larger than the Tanggula T760 5G. Additionally, it comes equipped with its own NPU for efficient neural processing capabilities.
In terms of core configuration, the Tanggula T760 5G has a more balanced distribution with equal numbers of high-performance cores (Cortex-A76) and power-efficient cores (Cortex-A55). The Dimensity 800U, on the other hand, prioritizes higher clock speeds with its 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, potentially offering better single-threaded performance.
While both processors support 5G connectivity, the Tanggula T760 5G has not disclosed the clock speeds of its CPU cores, providing limited information for a comprehensive comparison. However, one notable difference lies in the lithography, where the Tanggula T760 5G has a slight advantage with its 6nm process compared to the Dimensity 800U's 7nm. A smaller lithography can indicate better power efficiency and potentially improved performance.
Both processors incorporate NPUs, indicating their focus on AI-related tasks. However, without specific details on the NPUs, it is difficult to make a direct comparison in terms of their capabilities and efficiency.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 800U share similarities such as 8 cores, ARMv8.2-A instruction set, and NPUs, they differ in key aspects such as CPU core architecture, lithography, and clock speeds. Further analysis is required to determine their actual performance and power efficiency.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
TDP | 5 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 6 |
Shaders | 48 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2021 February |
Partnumber | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T | T760 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Helio G100
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Apple A17 Pro
3
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
4
MediaTek MT6739 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
5
Unisoc T9100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 vs Apple M2 (iPad)
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
9
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
10
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs MediaTek Helio G25