HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Unisoc SC9863A
The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and the Unisoc SC9863A are two processors with different specifications. Let's compare them.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G, it features an architecture consisting of 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. It is built on a 7 nm lithography process and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 6 Watts. Additionally, it includes neural processing capabilities with the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny, utilizing the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A also has 8 cores but with a different architecture. It consists of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Kirin 985 5G, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the SC9863A is built on a 28 nm lithography process, which is larger compared to the 7 nm of the Kirin 985 5G. It also has a lower TDP of 3 Watts. The Unisoc SC9863A includes a neural processing unit (NPU) for AI capabilities.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and the Unisoc SC9863A have several differences in their specifications. The Kirin 985 5G has a more powerful architecture with faster clock speeds, while the SC9863A has a lower TDP. The Kirin 985 5G is built on a more advanced 7 nm lithography process, while the SC9863A uses a 28 nm process. Both processors offer neural processing capabilities, with the Kirin 985 5G utilizing the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny, and the SC9863A featuring an NPU. These specifications should be taken into consideration when choosing a processor for specific computing needs.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G, it features an architecture consisting of 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. It is built on a 7 nm lithography process and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 6 Watts. Additionally, it includes neural processing capabilities with the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny, utilizing the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A also has 8 cores but with a different architecture. It consists of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Kirin 985 5G, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the SC9863A is built on a 28 nm lithography process, which is larger compared to the 7 nm of the Kirin 985 5G. It also has a lower TDP of 3 Watts. The Unisoc SC9863A includes a neural processing unit (NPU) for AI capabilities.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and the Unisoc SC9863A have several differences in their specifications. The Kirin 985 5G has a more powerful architecture with faster clock speeds, while the SC9863A has a lower TDP. The Kirin 985 5G is built on a more advanced 7 nm lithography process, while the SC9863A uses a 28 nm process. Both processors offer neural processing capabilities, with the Kirin 985 5G utilizing the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny, and the SC9863A featuring an NPU. These specifications should be taken into consideration when choosing a processor for specific computing needs.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 6 Watt | 3 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 550 MHz |
Execution units | 8 | 4 |
Shaders | 128 | 128 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2018 November |
Partnumber | Hi6290 | SC9863A |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs MediaTek Helio A25
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
3
MediaTek Helio P70 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
5
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Apple A16 Bionic
6
MediaTek Helio P65 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
8
Apple A12 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
9
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 2200
10
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712