HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9609
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G with Samsung Exynos 9609. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 3000 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 9 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 3 |
| Shaders | 128 | 48 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2560x1600 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 24MP, 2x 16MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 0.6 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2019 Quarter 2 |
| Partnumber | Hi6290 | S5E9609 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A13 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4
2
MediaTek Dimensity 6400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
5
Unisoc Tiger T615 vs MediaTek Helio G70
6
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs Samsung Exynos 990
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Apple A11 Bionic
8
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
9
Unisoc T8300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
10
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G