MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
The Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 920 are two processors that offer different specifications for users. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have 8 cores. The Tanggula T770 5G consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 features 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 has a more powerful architecture with its Cortex-A78 cores compared to the Tanggula T770 5G.
Both processors support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and have a lithography size of 6 nm. However, one noticeable difference is the TDP (Thermal Design Power). The Tanggula T770 5G has a TDP of 5 Watts, while the Dimensity 920 has a TDP of 10 Watts. This suggests that the Tanggula T770 5G is more power-efficient compared to the Dimensity 920, as it consumes less power while performing similar tasks.
Both processors also come equipped with Neural Processing Units (NPU) for enhanced AI capabilities. However, there is no detailed information available regarding the specific capabilities and performance of their NPUs.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 920 processors have 8 CPU cores and similar lithography sizes, there are notable differences in their architecture, TDP, and possibly their respective NPUs. The Tanggula T770 5G offers a configuration with a mix of Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores, lower TDP, and possibly similar AI capabilities with its NPU. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 features more powerful Cortex-A78 cores but has a higher TDP. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the users.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have 8 cores. The Tanggula T770 5G consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 features 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 has a more powerful architecture with its Cortex-A78 cores compared to the Tanggula T770 5G.
Both processors support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and have a lithography size of 6 nm. However, one noticeable difference is the TDP (Thermal Design Power). The Tanggula T770 5G has a TDP of 5 Watts, while the Dimensity 920 has a TDP of 10 Watts. This suggests that the Tanggula T770 5G is more power-efficient compared to the Dimensity 920, as it consumes less power while performing similar tasks.
Both processors also come equipped with Neural Processing Units (NPU) for enhanced AI capabilities. However, there is no detailed information available regarding the specific capabilities and performance of their NPUs.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 920 processors have 8 CPU cores and similar lithography sizes, there are notable differences in their architecture, TDP, and possibly their respective NPUs. The Tanggula T770 5G offers a configuration with a mix of Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores, lower TDP, and possibly similar AI capabilities with its NPU. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 features more powerful Cortex-A78 cores but has a higher TDP. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the users.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 32 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 6 |
Shaders | 96 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2160x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2021 February |
Partnumber | MT6877T | T770, Tiger T7520 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs MediaTek Helio P90
2
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
5
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
6
Apple A17 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Apple A15 Bionic
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Samsung Exynos 1280
10
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1