MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
The Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 920 are two processors that offer different specifications for users. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have 8 cores. The Tanggula T770 5G consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 features 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 has a more powerful architecture with its Cortex-A78 cores compared to the Tanggula T770 5G.
Both processors support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and have a lithography size of 6 nm. However, one noticeable difference is the TDP (Thermal Design Power). The Tanggula T770 5G has a TDP of 5 Watts, while the Dimensity 920 has a TDP of 10 Watts. This suggests that the Tanggula T770 5G is more power-efficient compared to the Dimensity 920, as it consumes less power while performing similar tasks.
Both processors also come equipped with Neural Processing Units (NPU) for enhanced AI capabilities. However, there is no detailed information available regarding the specific capabilities and performance of their NPUs.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 920 processors have 8 CPU cores and similar lithography sizes, there are notable differences in their architecture, TDP, and possibly their respective NPUs. The Tanggula T770 5G offers a configuration with a mix of Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores, lower TDP, and possibly similar AI capabilities with its NPU. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 features more powerful Cortex-A78 cores but has a higher TDP. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the users.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have 8 cores. The Tanggula T770 5G consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 features 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 has a more powerful architecture with its Cortex-A78 cores compared to the Tanggula T770 5G.
Both processors support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and have a lithography size of 6 nm. However, one noticeable difference is the TDP (Thermal Design Power). The Tanggula T770 5G has a TDP of 5 Watts, while the Dimensity 920 has a TDP of 10 Watts. This suggests that the Tanggula T770 5G is more power-efficient compared to the Dimensity 920, as it consumes less power while performing similar tasks.
Both processors also come equipped with Neural Processing Units (NPU) for enhanced AI capabilities. However, there is no detailed information available regarding the specific capabilities and performance of their NPUs.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 920 processors have 8 CPU cores and similar lithography sizes, there are notable differences in their architecture, TDP, and possibly their respective NPUs. The Tanggula T770 5G offers a configuration with a mix of Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores, lower TDP, and possibly similar AI capabilities with its NPU. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 features more powerful Cortex-A78 cores but has a higher TDP. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the users.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 32 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 6 |
| Shaders | 96 | 96 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2160x1080@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2021 February |
| Partnumber | MT6877T | T770, Tiger T7520 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 vs MediaTek Helio G88
2
Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
3
MediaTek Dimensity 8050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801
4
MediaTek Helio P70 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
5
HiSilicon Kirin 9020 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
6
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
7
HiSilicon Kirin 9000S vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
8
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs MediaTek Helio P22
9
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685