HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Samsung Exynos 2400e

VS
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G with Samsung Exynos 2400e. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?

AnTuTu 10

Total Score
Kirin 985 5G
467882
Exynos 2400e

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score
Kirin 985 5G
699
Exynos 2400e
2084

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score
Kirin 985 5G
2593
Exynos 2400e
6369

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76
3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 3.11 GHz – Cortex-X4
5x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.96 GHz – Cortex-A520
Number of cores 8 10
Instruction Set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
Lithography 7 nm 4 nm
TDP 6 Watt
Neural Processing Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture NPU

Memory (RAM)

Max amount up to 12 GB up to 24 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 4200 MHz
Memory-bus 4x16 bit 4x16 bit

Storage

Storage specification UFS 3.0

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G77 MP8 Xclipse 940
GPU Architecture Mali Valhall RDNA
GPU frequency 700 MHz 1095 MHz
Execution units 8 6
Shaders 128 768
DirectX 12 12.1
OpenCL API 2.1 2.0
OpenGL API ES 3.2
Vulkan API 1.2 1.3

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution 3120x1440 3840x2400
Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP 1x 320MP
Max Video Capture 4K@30fp 8K@30fps
Video codec support H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)
VP8
VP9
AV1
H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)
VP9

Wireless

4G network Yes Yes
5G network Yes Yes
Peak Download Speed 1.4 Gbps 9.64 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed 0.2 Gbps 2.55 Gbps
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) 7 (802.11be)
Bluetooth 5.0 5.4
Satellite navigation BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS
BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS
NavIC
QZSS

Supplemental Information

Launch Date 2020 Quarter 2 2024 Quarter 3
Partnumber Hi6290
Vertical Segment Mobiles Mobiles
Positioning Mid-end Flagship