HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the Unisoc Tiger T618 are two processors that offer different specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, this processor features an architecture that includes 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it is capable of handling multiple tasks efficiently. It also employs the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm, which makes it power efficient. This processor has a TDP of 6 Watt, indicating its low power consumption. Additionally, it features Ascend D110 Lite and HUAWEI Da Vinci architecture for neural processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T618 offers a different set of specifications. Its architecture consists of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, it has 8 cores in total. It also utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set for improved performance. However, the lithography of this processor is 12 nm, which may affect its power efficiency. It has a TDP of 10 Watt, indicating it consumes slightly more power. The Unisoc Tiger T618 also features an NPU for neural processing capabilities.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the Unisoc Tiger T618 have some differences in their specifications. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G has a more advanced architecture with a combination of Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores, while the Unisoc Tiger T618 features Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G has a smaller lithography of 7 nm, making it more power efficient, while the Unisoc Tiger T618 has a lithography of 12 nm. The TDP of the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G is 6 Watt, while the Unisoc Tiger T618 has a TDP of 10 Watt. Despite these differences, both processors offer neural processing capabilities to enhance their performance.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, this processor features an architecture that includes 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it is capable of handling multiple tasks efficiently. It also employs the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm, which makes it power efficient. This processor has a TDP of 6 Watt, indicating its low power consumption. Additionally, it features Ascend D110 Lite and HUAWEI Da Vinci architecture for neural processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T618 offers a different set of specifications. Its architecture consists of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, it has 8 cores in total. It also utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set for improved performance. However, the lithography of this processor is 12 nm, which may affect its power efficiency. It has a TDP of 10 Watt, indicating it consumes slightly more power. The Unisoc Tiger T618 also features an NPU for neural processing capabilities.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the Unisoc Tiger T618 have some differences in their specifications. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G has a more advanced architecture with a combination of Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores, while the Unisoc Tiger T618 features Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G has a smaller lithography of 7 nm, making it more power efficient, while the Unisoc Tiger T618 has a lithography of 12 nm. The TDP of the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G is 6 Watt, while the Unisoc Tiger T618 has a TDP of 10 Watt. Despite these differences, both processors offer neural processing capabilities to enhance their performance.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | 2 |
Shaders | 96 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 March | 2019 August |
Partnumber | T618 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs Apple A17 Pro
2
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
3
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 990
5
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
6
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
7
Google Tensor G2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
8
MediaTek Helio P90 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Unisoc SC9832E