HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Samsung Exynos 2200
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G with Samsung Exynos 2200. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 24 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Xclipse 920 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Samsugn Xclipse |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 555 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 3 |
| Shaders | 128 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 3840x2160@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 200MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 7.35 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 3.67 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2022 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | Hi6290 | S5E9925 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
2
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
3
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs MediaTek Helio G100
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
5
HiSilicon Kirin 9020 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
7
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
8
Google Tensor G4 vs MediaTek Helio A22
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
10
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030