HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Samsung Exynos 2200
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G with Samsung Exynos 2200. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 24 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Xclipse 920 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Samsugn Xclipse |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 555 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 3 |
| Shaders | 128 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 3840x2160@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 200MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 7.35 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 3.67 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2022 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | Hi6290 | S5E9925 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
2
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Apple A10X Fusion
3
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
4
MediaTek Helio G70 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
6
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Xiaomi Xring O1
7
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
8
MediaTek Helio G92 Max vs Apple M1 (iPad)
9
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7360
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 vs Samsung Exynos 9820