HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are both powerful processors, but they differ in several key specifications.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 985 5G features a combination of 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 820 is equipped with 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
Another important aspect is the lithography, which determines the size and power efficiency of the processor. Both processors have a 7 nm lithography, indicating advanced manufacturing processes.
In terms of thermal design power (TDP), the Kirin 985 5G has a TDP of 6 Watts, while the Dimensity 820 has a TDP of 10 Watts. This indicates that the Kirin 985 5G is more power-efficient and generates less heat compared to the Dimensity 820.
When it comes to neural processing capabilities, the Kirin 985 5G utilizes the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny in conjunction with Huawei's Da Vinci Architecture. On the other hand, the Dimensity 820 incorporates an NPU for neural processing tasks.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are both impressive processors with their own strengths. The Kirin 985 5G offers a diverse combination of CPU cores and a lower TDP, making it more power-efficient. The Dimensity 820, on the other hand, boasts higher clock speeds for its Cortex-A76 cores and utilizes an NPU for neural processing tasks. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 985 5G features a combination of 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 820 is equipped with 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
Another important aspect is the lithography, which determines the size and power efficiency of the processor. Both processors have a 7 nm lithography, indicating advanced manufacturing processes.
In terms of thermal design power (TDP), the Kirin 985 5G has a TDP of 6 Watts, while the Dimensity 820 has a TDP of 10 Watts. This indicates that the Kirin 985 5G is more power-efficient and generates less heat compared to the Dimensity 820.
When it comes to neural processing capabilities, the Kirin 985 5G utilizes the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny in conjunction with Huawei's Da Vinci Architecture. On the other hand, the Dimensity 820 incorporates an NPU for neural processing tasks.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are both impressive processors with their own strengths. The Kirin 985 5G offers a diverse combination of CPU cores and a lower TDP, making it more power-efficient. The Dimensity 820, on the other hand, boasts higher clock speeds for its Cortex-A76 cores and utilizes an NPU for neural processing tasks. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Mali-G57 MP5 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 8 | 5 |
Shaders | 128 | 80 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2020 May |
Partnumber | Hi6290 | MT6875 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A13 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
2
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
4
Samsung Exynos 850 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
5
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs MediaTek Helio G25
6
MediaTek Helio G90T vs MediaTek Helio G90
7
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
9
MediaTek Helio P65 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080