HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
When comparing the specifications of the HiSilicon Kirin 980 and the Unisoc Tiger T610 processors, several notable differences can be observed.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 boasts a more advanced architecture with 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. In contrast, the Unisoc Tiger T610 features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The HiSilicon Kirin 980 therefore offers a higher maximum clock speed and a more diverse range of cores, potentially leading to improved performance and efficiency.
Regarding the number of cores, both processors offer 8 cores, ensuring efficient multitasking capabilities and smoother performance in handling demanding tasks.
In terms of instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 utilizes the ARMv8-A set, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 employs the ARMv8.2-A set. While similar, the ARMv8-A instruction set utilized by the HiSilicon Kirin 980 may offer better compatibility and optimization with various software and applications.
When it comes to lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm process, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 is fabricated using a 12 nm process. The smaller lithography of the HiSilicon Kirin 980 allows for more transistors to fit onto the processor, resulting in potentially higher performance and improved power efficiency. Speaking of which, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 also has a lower TDP (thermal design power) of 6 Watts compared to the Unisoc Tiger T610's 10 Watts, suggesting that it may consume less power during operation.
Lastly, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 incorporates the HiSilicon Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances AI capabilities and enables advanced neural network processing. The Unisoc Tiger T610 does not have a dedicated NPU, which may lead to inferior AI performance when compared to the Kirin 980.
In conclusion, while both processors offer 8 cores and relatively similar clock speeds, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 stands out with its more advanced architecture, smaller lithography, lower TDP, and the inclusion of the HiSilicon Dual NPU. These specifications suggest that the HiSilicon Kirin 980 may deliver better overall performance, power efficiency, and AI capabilities compared to the Unisoc Tiger T610.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 boasts a more advanced architecture with 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. In contrast, the Unisoc Tiger T610 features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The HiSilicon Kirin 980 therefore offers a higher maximum clock speed and a more diverse range of cores, potentially leading to improved performance and efficiency.
Regarding the number of cores, both processors offer 8 cores, ensuring efficient multitasking capabilities and smoother performance in handling demanding tasks.
In terms of instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 utilizes the ARMv8-A set, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 employs the ARMv8.2-A set. While similar, the ARMv8-A instruction set utilized by the HiSilicon Kirin 980 may offer better compatibility and optimization with various software and applications.
When it comes to lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm process, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 is fabricated using a 12 nm process. The smaller lithography of the HiSilicon Kirin 980 allows for more transistors to fit onto the processor, resulting in potentially higher performance and improved power efficiency. Speaking of which, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 also has a lower TDP (thermal design power) of 6 Watts compared to the Unisoc Tiger T610's 10 Watts, suggesting that it may consume less power during operation.
Lastly, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 incorporates the HiSilicon Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances AI capabilities and enables advanced neural network processing. The Unisoc Tiger T610 does not have a dedicated NPU, which may lead to inferior AI performance when compared to the Kirin 980.
In conclusion, while both processors offer 8 cores and relatively similar clock speeds, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 stands out with its more advanced architecture, smaller lithography, lower TDP, and the inclusion of the HiSilicon Dual NPU. These specifications suggest that the HiSilicon Kirin 980 may deliver better overall performance, power efficiency, and AI capabilities compared to the Unisoc Tiger T610.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G76 MP10 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 720 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
Execution units | 10 | 2 |
Shaders | 160 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 4 | 2019 June |
Partnumber | T610 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
2
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
3
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
4
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Samsung Exynos 9820
5
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
6
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
9
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1