HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and the MediaTek Dimensity 720 are two processors that offer impressive specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G, it boasts a powerful CPU architecture. It includes 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor ensures smooth performance for multitasking and demanding applications. It operates on a 7 nm lithography, which signifies its energy efficiency and ability to deliver high performance while consuming less power. The processor also incorporates Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny Neural Processing, powered by the Huawei Da Vinci Architecture. This ensures excellent AI and machine learning capabilities.
Comparatively, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 also offers impressive features. It utilizes a CPU architecture consisting of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores. With its 7 nm lithography, it matches the energy efficiency of the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G. However, it differs in terms of Neural Processing, as it incorporates an NPU (Neural Processing Unit) for enhanced AI capabilities.
In terms of power consumption, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 Watts, which contributes to its low energy consumption. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts. While both processors are designed to be power-efficient, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G is likely to offer better energy savings.
Overall, both processors offer impressive specifications and are designed to deliver high performance. The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G excels in terms of power efficiency and incorporates advanced AI capabilities with its Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny Neural Processing. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 offers a powerful CPU architecture and an NPU for efficient AI processing. The choice between the two processors would ultimately depend on individual preferences and the specific requirements of the device or application they are being used for.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G, it boasts a powerful CPU architecture. It includes 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor ensures smooth performance for multitasking and demanding applications. It operates on a 7 nm lithography, which signifies its energy efficiency and ability to deliver high performance while consuming less power. The processor also incorporates Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny Neural Processing, powered by the Huawei Da Vinci Architecture. This ensures excellent AI and machine learning capabilities.
Comparatively, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 also offers impressive features. It utilizes a CPU architecture consisting of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores. With its 7 nm lithography, it matches the energy efficiency of the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G. However, it differs in terms of Neural Processing, as it incorporates an NPU (Neural Processing Unit) for enhanced AI capabilities.
In terms of power consumption, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 Watts, which contributes to its low energy consumption. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts. While both processors are designed to be power-efficient, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G is likely to offer better energy savings.
Overall, both processors offer impressive specifications and are designed to deliver high performance. The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G excels in terms of power efficiency and incorporates advanced AI capabilities with its Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny Neural Processing. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 offers a powerful CPU architecture and an NPU for efficient AI processing. The choice between the two processors would ultimately depend on individual preferences and the specific requirements of the device or application they are being used for.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Mali-G57 MP3 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 8 | 3 |
Shaders | 128 | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2520x1080@90Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 4K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2020 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | Hi6290 | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Samsung Exynos 850
3
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
4
MediaTek Helio P95 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
6
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
7
MediaTek Helio P70 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 980
9
Apple A14 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
10
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Unisoc SC9832E