HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are two powerful processors that are designed to enhance the performance of mobile devices.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G, it boasts an advanced architecture consisting of 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of eight cores, this processor ensures efficient multitasking and smooth operation. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and incorporates Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 for enhanced neural processing capabilities. Additionally, the impressive 5 nm lithography and 15300 million transistors contribute to improved power efficiency and overall performance. With a TDP of just 6 Watts, it offers excellent energy efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 exhibits its own set of impressive specifications. Its architecture consists of 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with various software. The Dimensity 820 employs a 7 nm lithography, providing a balance between power efficiency and performance. Additionally, it features an NPU for efficient neural processing. However, the TDP of the Dimensity 820 is higher, at 10 Watts.
In summary, both the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 820 processors offer impressive specifications and advanced features. The Kirin 9000E 5G stands out with its diverse core architecture, advanced neural processing capabilities, and lower TDP. On the other hand, the Dimensity 820 offers a balanced performance with its powerful CPU cores, efficient neural processing unit, and slightly higher power consumption. The choice between these processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the device manufacturer and its intended users.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G, it boasts an advanced architecture consisting of 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of eight cores, this processor ensures efficient multitasking and smooth operation. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and incorporates Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 for enhanced neural processing capabilities. Additionally, the impressive 5 nm lithography and 15300 million transistors contribute to improved power efficiency and overall performance. With a TDP of just 6 Watts, it offers excellent energy efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 exhibits its own set of impressive specifications. Its architecture consists of 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with various software. The Dimensity 820 employs a 7 nm lithography, providing a balance between power efficiency and performance. Additionally, it features an NPU for efficient neural processing. However, the TDP of the Dimensity 820 is higher, at 10 Watts.
In summary, both the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 820 processors offer impressive specifications and advanced features. The Kirin 9000E 5G stands out with its diverse core architecture, advanced neural processing capabilities, and lower TDP. On the other hand, the Dimensity 820 offers a balanced performance with its powerful CPU cores, efficient neural processing unit, and slightly higher power consumption. The choice between these processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the device manufacturer and its intended users.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Mali-G57 MP5 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 5 |
| Shaders | 352 | 80 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2020 May |
| Partnumber | MT6875 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc SC9832E vs MediaTek Helio G92 Max
2
Unisoc Tiger T615 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
3
Apple M4 (iPad) vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300
4
MediaTek Helio G50 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
6
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Xiaomi Xring O1
7
Apple A10X Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs MediaTek Helio P60
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Samsung Exynos 2600
10
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050