HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are two processors with different specifications. The Kirin 985 5G has a higher clock frequency with a total of 8 cores, consisting of 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55. On the other hand, the Dimensity 700 has 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores.
In terms of architecture, both processors have an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a 7 nm lithography. However, it is worth noting that the Kirin 985 5G includes additional features such as the Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny Neural Processing, utilizing the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 985 5G has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 Watts, which is lower compared to the Dimensity 700's TDP of 10 Watts.
Overall, the Kirin 985 5G has a higher clock frequency and lower power consumption, making it potentially more efficient and powerful compared to the Dimensity 700. However, it should be noted that the performance of a processor depends on various factors, such as the specific device it is used in and the optimization of software and hardware together.
Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and needs of the device or application it is intended for. It would be wise to compare benchmarks and real-world performance tests before making a decision.
In terms of architecture, both processors have an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a 7 nm lithography. However, it is worth noting that the Kirin 985 5G includes additional features such as the Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny Neural Processing, utilizing the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 985 5G has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 Watts, which is lower compared to the Dimensity 700's TDP of 10 Watts.
Overall, the Kirin 985 5G has a higher clock frequency and lower power consumption, making it potentially more efficient and powerful compared to the Dimensity 700. However, it should be noted that the performance of a processor depends on various factors, such as the specific device it is used in and the optimization of software and hardware together.
Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and needs of the device or application it is intended for. It would be wise to compare benchmarks and real-world performance tests before making a decision.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 950 MHz |
Execution units | 8 | 2 |
Shaders | 128 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2520x1080@90Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 2K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2021 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | Hi6290 | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
2
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Apple A9
3
Apple A10 Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
4
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs MediaTek Helio G95
5
HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
6
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Apple M4 (iPad)
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
9
Google Tensor G4 vs Apple A18 Pro
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus