HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are two processors with different specifications. The Kirin 985 5G has a higher clock frequency with a total of 8 cores, consisting of 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55. On the other hand, the Dimensity 700 has 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores.
In terms of architecture, both processors have an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a 7 nm lithography. However, it is worth noting that the Kirin 985 5G includes additional features such as the Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny Neural Processing, utilizing the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 985 5G has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 Watts, which is lower compared to the Dimensity 700's TDP of 10 Watts.
Overall, the Kirin 985 5G has a higher clock frequency and lower power consumption, making it potentially more efficient and powerful compared to the Dimensity 700. However, it should be noted that the performance of a processor depends on various factors, such as the specific device it is used in and the optimization of software and hardware together.
Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and needs of the device or application it is intended for. It would be wise to compare benchmarks and real-world performance tests before making a decision.
In terms of architecture, both processors have an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a 7 nm lithography. However, it is worth noting that the Kirin 985 5G includes additional features such as the Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny Neural Processing, utilizing the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 985 5G has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 Watts, which is lower compared to the Dimensity 700's TDP of 10 Watts.
Overall, the Kirin 985 5G has a higher clock frequency and lower power consumption, making it potentially more efficient and powerful compared to the Dimensity 700. However, it should be noted that the performance of a processor depends on various factors, such as the specific device it is used in and the optimization of software and hardware together.
Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and needs of the device or application it is intended for. It would be wise to compare benchmarks and real-world performance tests before making a decision.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 950 MHz |
Execution units | 8 | 2 |
Shaders | 128 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2520x1080@90Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 2K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2021 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | Hi6290 | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Apple A14 Bionic
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs MediaTek Helio G35
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs MediaTek Helio G88
4
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Unisoc SC7731E
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
6
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
7
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs MediaTek Helio P65
8
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
9
MediaTek Helio G90 vs Apple A10X Fusion
10
MediaTek Helio G25 vs Samsung Exynos 980