HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G

The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G are two processors manufactured by HiSilicon for mobile devices. Both processors offer excellent performance and power efficiency, but there are some notable differences in their specifications.

In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 985 5G features a combination of Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores. It has one high-performance Cortex-A76 core running at 2.58 GHz, three Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, and four power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores operating at 1.84 GHz. On the other hand, the Kirin 9000E 5G offers a more powerful configuration with a Cortex-A77 core running at 3.13 GHz, three Cortex-A77 cores clocked at 2.54 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 cores operating at 2.05 GHz. This architecture difference suggests that the Kirin 9000E 5G could deliver superior single-core and multi-core performance compared to the Kirin 985 5G.

Another key difference lies in their lithography. The Kirin 985 5G is manufactured using a 7 nm process, while the Kirin 9000E 5G is built on a more advanced 5 nm process. The smaller lithography allows for more transistors to be packed into the same space, resulting in improved efficiency, reduced power consumption, and potentially better heat dissipation in the Kirin 9000E 5G.

Furthermore, the Kirin 985 5G utilizes the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny for neural processing tasks, employing the Huawei Da Vinci Architecture. On the other hand, the Kirin 9000E 5G employs the Ascend Lite and Ascend Tiny for neural processing, utilizing the upgraded Huawei Da Vinci Architecture 2.0. These differences in neural processing capabilities could impact the performance and efficiency of AI-related tasks on devices using these processors.

In conclusion, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and Kirin 9000E 5G offer strong performance and power efficiency, the Kirin 9000E 5G appears to have the edge with its more powerful CPU configuration and smaller lithography, potentially delivering better overall performance. However, the specific requirements and optimizations of a device should also be considered when choosing between these two processors.