HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
The HiSilicon Kirin 980 and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are both powerful processors with their own strengths and weaknesses.
In terms of CPU architecture, the Kirin 980 features two 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, two 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and four 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 700 has two 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and six 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores, but the Kirin 980 offers a higher clock speed on its main cores, potentially resulting in better performance for demanding tasks.
In terms of lithography, both processors are manufactured using the 7 nm process, indicating their efficiency and lower power consumption. The Kirin 980 boasts a massive 6900 million transistors, which could potentially enhance its performance and efficiency. The Dimensity 700 does not provide information regarding the number of transistors available.
In terms of instruction set, the Kirin 980 utilizes ARMv8-A, whereas the Dimensity 700 employs ARMv8.2-A. While this may seem like a minor difference, it could contribute to variations in compatibility and optimization with certain software or applications.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), the Kirin 980 has a lower TDP of 6 Watts compared to the Dimensity 700's TDP of 10 Watts. This implies that the Kirin 980 may generate less heat during operation, which could be beneficial for devices to maintain optimal performance and prevent overheating.
The Kirin 980 stands out with its HiSilicon Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances AI processing capabilities. The Dimensity 700 does not specify if it has a dedicated NPU. This difference may impact the performance of artificial intelligence tasks or applications that heavily rely on AI processing.
Considering these specifications, the Kirin 980 offers a higher clock speed on its main cores, potentially resulting in better performance for demanding tasks. With a lower TDP and the inclusion of a dedicated NPU, the Kirin 980 may have an edge in AI processing. However, the Dimensity 700 performs well with its 7 nm lithography and provides a good balance between performance and power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
In terms of CPU architecture, the Kirin 980 features two 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, two 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and four 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 700 has two 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and six 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores, but the Kirin 980 offers a higher clock speed on its main cores, potentially resulting in better performance for demanding tasks.
In terms of lithography, both processors are manufactured using the 7 nm process, indicating their efficiency and lower power consumption. The Kirin 980 boasts a massive 6900 million transistors, which could potentially enhance its performance and efficiency. The Dimensity 700 does not provide information regarding the number of transistors available.
In terms of instruction set, the Kirin 980 utilizes ARMv8-A, whereas the Dimensity 700 employs ARMv8.2-A. While this may seem like a minor difference, it could contribute to variations in compatibility and optimization with certain software or applications.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), the Kirin 980 has a lower TDP of 6 Watts compared to the Dimensity 700's TDP of 10 Watts. This implies that the Kirin 980 may generate less heat during operation, which could be beneficial for devices to maintain optimal performance and prevent overheating.
The Kirin 980 stands out with its HiSilicon Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances AI processing capabilities. The Dimensity 700 does not specify if it has a dedicated NPU. This difference may impact the performance of artificial intelligence tasks or applications that heavily rely on AI processing.
Considering these specifications, the Kirin 980 offers a higher clock speed on its main cores, potentially resulting in better performance for demanding tasks. With a lower TDP and the inclusion of a dedicated NPU, the Kirin 980 may have an edge in AI processing. However, the Dimensity 700 performs well with its 7 nm lithography and provides a good balance between performance and power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G76 MP10 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 720 MHz | 950 MHz |
Execution units | 10 | 2 |
Shaders | 160 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2520x1080@90Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 2K@30FPS |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 4 | 2021 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs MediaTek Helio P90
3
MediaTek Helio G70 vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
4
MediaTek Helio P65 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Samsung Exynos 7420
7
MediaTek Helio G36 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
8
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
9
Samsung Exynos 850 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
10
MediaTek Helio G90 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955