HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The HiSilicon Kirin 970 and Unisoc Tiger T710 are two processors with different specifications. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 970, it features an 8-core architecture with 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This processor is built on a 10 nm lithography process and has a total of 5500 million transistors. It operates with a TDP of 9 Watts and utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set. Additionally, it comes with the HiSilicon NPU for neural processing.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 also boasts an 8-core architecture. It has 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Unlike the Kirin 970, the Tiger T710 is manufactured on a 12 nm lithography process. It supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and offers dual NPUs for neural processing.
In terms of CPU cores, both processors have 8 cores. However, the architectures differ. The Kirin 970 has 4 Cortex-A73 cores, which are higher-performing cores, and 4 Cortex-A53 cores, which are more power-efficient. Meanwhile, the Tiger T710 has 4 Cortex-A75 cores, which are also high-performance cores, and 4 Cortex-A55 cores, designed for power efficiency.
Regarding instruction sets, the Kirin 970 utilizes ARMv8-A, while the Tiger T710 uses the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set, offering potentially better performance and features.
The lithography process also varies, with the Kirin 970 on the more advanced 10 nm process, potentially offering better power efficiency and thermal management compared to the Tiger T710's 12 nm process.
Lastly, both processors feature neural processing units (NPU), but there are differences in their implementation. The Kirin 970 includes the HiSilicon NPU, while the Tiger T710 offers dual NPUs. The specific capabilities and performance of these NPUs may differ based on the implementation.
In conclusion, while both processors have 8 cores and provide neural processing capabilities, there are notable differences in their specifications. The Kirin 970 has a more diverse CPU core architecture and is built on a more advanced 10 nm lithography process. On the other hand, the Tiger T710 utilizes the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set and offers dual NPUs. The choice between these processors will depend on specific requirements and preferences in terms of performance, power efficiency, and other features.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 970, it features an 8-core architecture with 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This processor is built on a 10 nm lithography process and has a total of 5500 million transistors. It operates with a TDP of 9 Watts and utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set. Additionally, it comes with the HiSilicon NPU for neural processing.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 also boasts an 8-core architecture. It has 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Unlike the Kirin 970, the Tiger T710 is manufactured on a 12 nm lithography process. It supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and offers dual NPUs for neural processing.
In terms of CPU cores, both processors have 8 cores. However, the architectures differ. The Kirin 970 has 4 Cortex-A73 cores, which are higher-performing cores, and 4 Cortex-A53 cores, which are more power-efficient. Meanwhile, the Tiger T710 has 4 Cortex-A75 cores, which are also high-performance cores, and 4 Cortex-A55 cores, designed for power efficiency.
Regarding instruction sets, the Kirin 970 utilizes ARMv8-A, while the Tiger T710 uses the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set, offering potentially better performance and features.
The lithography process also varies, with the Kirin 970 on the more advanced 10 nm process, potentially offering better power efficiency and thermal management compared to the Tiger T710's 12 nm process.
Lastly, both processors feature neural processing units (NPU), but there are differences in their implementation. The Kirin 970 includes the HiSilicon NPU, while the Tiger T710 offers dual NPUs. The specific capabilities and performance of these NPUs may differ based on the implementation.
In conclusion, while both processors have 8 cores and provide neural processing capabilities, there are notable differences in their specifications. The Kirin 970 has a more diverse CPU core architecture and is built on a more advanced 10 nm lithography process. On the other hand, the Tiger T710 utilizes the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set and offers dual NPUs. The choice between these processors will depend on specific requirements and preferences in terms of performance, power efficiency, and other features.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 10 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 9 Watt | |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G72 MP12 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 750 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 12 | |
Shaders | 192 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2017 September | 2019 |
Partnumber | Hi3670 | T710 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
2
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
3
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Apple A16 Bionic
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
5
Apple A10X Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
6
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
8
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Unisoc Tiger T612
9
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1