HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 970 and Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are two processors known for their impressive specifications. Let's compare them to see how they stack up against each other.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 970, it boasts an architecture with 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is designed to handle demanding tasks efficiently. It also uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and operates at a lithography of 10 nm. The Kirin 970 is known for its impressive performance with a TDP of 9 Watts. Furthermore, it incorporates the HiSilicon NPU, which enhances the processor's neural processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G features an architecture with 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Kirin 970, it also has 8 cores, which ensures smooth multitasking and overall efficient performance. The Tanggula T740 operates at a lithography of 12 nm, slightly higher than the Kirin 970. Additionally, it utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. One standout feature of this processor is its dual NPU, which further enhances its neural processing capabilities.
In summary, both processors have their own strengths. The HiSilicon Kirin 970 impresses with its higher clock speed and a slightly more advanced instruction set. It also has a lower TDP, indicating more efficient power consumption. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G offers versatility with its dual NPU, enabling it to excel in neural processing tasks. However, it should be noted that the Tanggula T740 operates at a slightly higher lithography. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on specific usage requirements and priorities such as performance, power consumption, and neural processing capabilities.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 970, it boasts an architecture with 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is designed to handle demanding tasks efficiently. It also uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and operates at a lithography of 10 nm. The Kirin 970 is known for its impressive performance with a TDP of 9 Watts. Furthermore, it incorporates the HiSilicon NPU, which enhances the processor's neural processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G features an architecture with 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Kirin 970, it also has 8 cores, which ensures smooth multitasking and overall efficient performance. The Tanggula T740 operates at a lithography of 12 nm, slightly higher than the Kirin 970. Additionally, it utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. One standout feature of this processor is its dual NPU, which further enhances its neural processing capabilities.
In summary, both processors have their own strengths. The HiSilicon Kirin 970 impresses with its higher clock speed and a slightly more advanced instruction set. It also has a lower TDP, indicating more efficient power consumption. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G offers versatility with its dual NPU, enabling it to excel in neural processing tasks. However, it should be noted that the Tanggula T740 operates at a slightly higher lithography. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on specific usage requirements and priorities such as performance, power consumption, and neural processing capabilities.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 10 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
| TDP | 9 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | HiSilicon NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G72 MP12 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 750 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Execution units | 12 | |
| Shaders | 192 | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2960x1440@60Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.75 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2017 September | 2020 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | Hi3670 | T740, Tiger T7510 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Apple M2 (iPad)
2
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
4
HiSilicon Kirin 8020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8050 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7060
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
10
Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 6400