HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
The HiSilicon Kirin 950 and Kirin 970 are two processors designed by the Chinese semiconductor company, HiSilicon. Let's compare their specifications to see how they differ.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set. It is built using a 16 nm lithography process and contains around 2000 million transistors. The thermal design power (TDP) for this processor is 5 Watts.
Moving on to the HiSilicon Kirin 970, it also consists of 8 cores but with an upgraded architecture. The processor includes 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, which improves performance. Similar to the Kirin 950, it uses the ARMv8-A instruction set. However, the Kirin 970 is built using a more advanced 10 nm lithography process, resulting in increased efficiency and potentially better power management. It also boasts a significantly higher number of transistors at around 5500 million, indicating more complex circuitry. The TDP for the Kirin 970 is slightly higher, rated at 9 Watts.
One significant feature that sets the Kirin 970 apart from its predecessor is the addition of the HiSilicon NPU (Neural Processing Unit). This specialized component enhances the processor's capability to handle AI-related tasks, providing improved performance for artificial intelligence and machine learning applications.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 offers several improvements over the Kirin 950 in terms of architecture, lithography process, transistor count, and the inclusion of the NPU for AI processing. These advancements contribute to enhanced overall performance and efficiency, making the Kirin 970 a more powerful and technologically advanced option.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set. It is built using a 16 nm lithography process and contains around 2000 million transistors. The thermal design power (TDP) for this processor is 5 Watts.
Moving on to the HiSilicon Kirin 970, it also consists of 8 cores but with an upgraded architecture. The processor includes 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, which improves performance. Similar to the Kirin 950, it uses the ARMv8-A instruction set. However, the Kirin 970 is built using a more advanced 10 nm lithography process, resulting in increased efficiency and potentially better power management. It also boasts a significantly higher number of transistors at around 5500 million, indicating more complex circuitry. The TDP for the Kirin 970 is slightly higher, rated at 9 Watts.
One significant feature that sets the Kirin 970 apart from its predecessor is the addition of the HiSilicon NPU (Neural Processing Unit). This specialized component enhances the processor's capability to handle AI-related tasks, providing improved performance for artificial intelligence and machine learning applications.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 offers several improvements over the Kirin 950 in terms of architecture, lithography process, transistor count, and the inclusion of the NPU for AI processing. These advancements contribute to enhanced overall performance and efficiency, making the Kirin 970 a more powerful and technologically advanced option.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 10 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | 5500 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 9 Watt |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G72 MP12 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 750 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 12 |
Shaders | 64 | 192 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 November | 2017 September |
Partnumber | Hi3650 | Hi3670 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs MediaTek Helio A25
2
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
3
Unisoc SC9863A vs MediaTek Helio G35
4
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
5
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
6
MediaTek Helio G96 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
8
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
9
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs MediaTek Helio G90
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200