Unisoc SC9863A vs Unisoc Tiger T606
The Unisoc SC9863A and Unisoc Tiger T606 are two processors with different specifications. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the SC9863A has 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 cores. In contrast, the Tiger T606 has 2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores, but the Tiger T606 has a slightly higher-performing architecture with its Cortex-A75 cores.
Moving on to the instruction set, both processors have the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set, meaning they support advanced instructions and features.
When it comes to lithography, the SC9863A is built on a 28 nm process, while the Tiger T606 utilizes a more advanced 12 nm process. The smaller lithography generally indicates better power efficiency and performance potential.
In terms of power consumption, the SC9863A has a lower thermal design power (TDP) of 3 watts, suggesting it consumes less energy during operation. On the other hand, the Tiger T606 has a higher TDP of 10 watts, which indicates it may consume more power.
Lastly, only the Unisoc SC9863A has a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is a specialized component for handling artificial intelligence tasks. This feature gives the SC9863A an advantage in AI-related applications.
In summary, the Unisoc SC9863A and Tiger T606 have different strengths and weaknesses. The SC9863A has a mix of high and low-performance cores, a slightly outdated lithography, lower power consumption, and an NPU for AI tasks. In contrast, the Tiger T606 has a more powerful architecture, a more advanced lithography, but higher power consumption and lacks an NPU. The suitability of each processor will depend on the specific needs and use cases of the target device.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the SC9863A has 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 cores. In contrast, the Tiger T606 has 2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores, but the Tiger T606 has a slightly higher-performing architecture with its Cortex-A75 cores.
Moving on to the instruction set, both processors have the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set, meaning they support advanced instructions and features.
When it comes to lithography, the SC9863A is built on a 28 nm process, while the Tiger T606 utilizes a more advanced 12 nm process. The smaller lithography generally indicates better power efficiency and performance potential.
In terms of power consumption, the SC9863A has a lower thermal design power (TDP) of 3 watts, suggesting it consumes less energy during operation. On the other hand, the Tiger T606 has a higher TDP of 10 watts, which indicates it may consume more power.
Lastly, only the Unisoc SC9863A has a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is a specialized component for handling artificial intelligence tasks. This feature gives the SC9863A an advantage in AI-related applications.
In summary, the Unisoc SC9863A and Tiger T606 have different strengths and weaknesses. The SC9863A has a mix of high and low-performance cores, a slightly outdated lithography, lower power consumption, and an NPU for AI tasks. In contrast, the Tiger T606 has a more powerful architecture, a more advanced lithography, but higher power consumption and lacks an NPU. The suitability of each processor will depend on the specific needs and use cases of the target device.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 3 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | PowerVR Rogue | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 550 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 1 |
| Shaders | 128 | 16 |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | 1600x900@90Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 November | 2021 October |
| Partnumber | SC9863A | T606 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Unisoc Tiger T616
2
MediaTek MT6737 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2
3
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Samsung Exynos 1280
4
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
5
MediaTek Helio P70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
7
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs MediaTek Helio G70
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
9
Apple A13 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2400
10
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020