HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T310
The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the Unisoc Tiger T310 are two processors that offer different features and specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, it boasts an impressive architecture consisting of 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor ensures fast and efficient performance. It operates on a 7 nm lithography, which means it is more power-efficient and capable of delivering excellent performance while consuming less power. The Kirin 820 5G runs on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 6 Watts. Additionally, it includes neural processing capabilities with the Ascend D110 Lite and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, making it suitable for AI-related tasks.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T310 has a different architecture. It features 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 4 cores. Although it has fewer cores compared to the Kirin 820 5G, it still provides decent performance. The Tiger T310 operates on a 12 nm lithography, which is less advanced than the Kirin 820 5G but still efficient. Like the Kirin 820 5G, it also runs on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and Unisoc Tiger T310 differ in terms of their CPU cores, architecture, and lithography. The Kirin 820 5G offers a more powerful and efficient performance with its higher number of cores and advanced 7 nm lithography. On the other hand, the Tiger T310 provides decent performance with its 4 cores and 12 nm lithography. It is important to consider these specifications when choosing a processor that suits your needs and preferences.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, it boasts an impressive architecture consisting of 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor ensures fast and efficient performance. It operates on a 7 nm lithography, which means it is more power-efficient and capable of delivering excellent performance while consuming less power. The Kirin 820 5G runs on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 6 Watts. Additionally, it includes neural processing capabilities with the Ascend D110 Lite and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, making it suitable for AI-related tasks.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T310 has a different architecture. It features 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 4 cores. Although it has fewer cores compared to the Kirin 820 5G, it still provides decent performance. The Tiger T310 operates on a 12 nm lithography, which is less advanced than the Kirin 820 5G but still efficient. Like the Kirin 820 5G, it also runs on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and Unisoc Tiger T310 differ in terms of their CPU cores, architecture, and lithography. The Kirin 820 5G offers a more powerful and efficient performance with its higher number of cores and advanced 7 nm lithography. On the other hand, the Tiger T310 provides decent performance with its 4 cores and 12 nm lithography. It is important to consider these specifications when choosing a processor that suits your needs and preferences.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 6 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1333 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | PowerVR Rogue |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 660 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | 2 |
Shaders | 96 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 10 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1600x720 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 March | 2019 April |
Partnumber | T310 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P90 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
2
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs Apple M1 (iPad)
3
MediaTek Helio G36 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
4
MediaTek Helio G37 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
5
Samsung Exynos 2400e vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
6
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
7
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
8
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs MediaTek Helio G50
9
Apple A9 vs Samsung Exynos 990
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Apple A10 Fusion