HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the HiSilicon Kirin 970 are both impressive processors created by HiSilicon. However, they have some notable differences in their specifications.
Let's start with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G. This processor has a powerful architecture consisting of 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a great balance between performance and power efficiency. The Kirin 820 5G also utilizes ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a 7 nm lithography, which contributes to its efficiency. Additionally, it has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 6 Watts, making it very power-efficient. The Neural Processing capabilities of this processor are brought by the Ascend D110 Lite and the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, ensuring efficient AI processing.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 has a slightly different architecture. It consists of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, totaling 8 cores. This processor uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a 10 nm lithography, which is still impressive but not as advanced as the Kirin 820 5G. The Kirin 970 has 5500 million transistors, highlighting its technical capacity. This processor has a TDP of 9 Watts, which is a bit higher than the Kirin 820 5G. The Neural Processing Unit (NPU) used in the Kirin 970 is the HiSilicon NPU, ensuring efficient AI tasks.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the HiSilicon Kirin 970 are both powerful processors designed by HiSilicon, but they have some variations in their specifications. The Kirin 820 5G stands out with its more advanced architecture, 7 nm lithography, lower TDP, and the Ascend D110 Lite and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture for Neural Processing. Meanwhile, the Kirin 970 offers a strong configuration with its 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores, 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, 10 nm lithography, and the HiSilicon NPU for Neural Processing.
Let's start with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G. This processor has a powerful architecture consisting of 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a great balance between performance and power efficiency. The Kirin 820 5G also utilizes ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a 7 nm lithography, which contributes to its efficiency. Additionally, it has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 6 Watts, making it very power-efficient. The Neural Processing capabilities of this processor are brought by the Ascend D110 Lite and the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, ensuring efficient AI processing.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 has a slightly different architecture. It consists of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, totaling 8 cores. This processor uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a 10 nm lithography, which is still impressive but not as advanced as the Kirin 820 5G. The Kirin 970 has 5500 million transistors, highlighting its technical capacity. This processor has a TDP of 9 Watts, which is a bit higher than the Kirin 820 5G. The Neural Processing Unit (NPU) used in the Kirin 970 is the HiSilicon NPU, ensuring efficient AI tasks.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the HiSilicon Kirin 970 are both powerful processors designed by HiSilicon, but they have some variations in their specifications. The Kirin 820 5G stands out with its more advanced architecture, 7 nm lithography, lower TDP, and the Ascend D110 Lite and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture for Neural Processing. Meanwhile, the Kirin 970 offers a strong configuration with its 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores, 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, 10 nm lithography, and the HiSilicon NPU for Neural Processing.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 9 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | HiSilicon NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G72 MP12 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 750 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | 12 |
Shaders | 96 | 192 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.6 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 March | 2017 September |
Partnumber | Hi3670 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
3
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
4
HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
5
MediaTek Helio G90T vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
7
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
9
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Apple A10X Fusion