HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and the HiSilicon Kirin 960 are both processors manufactured by HiSilicon. While they have some similarities, there are also notable differences in their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, it features an architecture that includes 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This octa-core processor operates on a 7 nm lithography, which contributes to its energy efficiency with a TDP of 6 watts. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G also boasts Ascend D110 Lite for neural processing, utilizing HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture.
In comparison, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 consists of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This octa-core processor operates on a 16 nm lithography and has a TDP of 5 watts. With 4000 million transistors, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 has a higher transistor count compared to the Kirin 820 5G.
Both processors support the ARMv8 instruction set, enabling compatibility with a wide range of applications and software. However, the Kirin 820 5G has a more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set, while the Kirin 960 utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set.
When it comes to the Neural Processing Unit (NPU), the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G incorporates Ascend D110 Lite, which enhances its capabilities for AI-related tasks. The Kirin 960, on the other hand, does not have a dedicated NPU.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G has a more advanced architecture with a wider range of clock speeds, a more efficient lithography, and an NPU for enhanced AI capabilities. The Kirin 960, on the other hand, has a higher transistor count and a slightly lower TDP. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, it features an architecture that includes 1x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.22 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This octa-core processor operates on a 7 nm lithography, which contributes to its energy efficiency with a TDP of 6 watts. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G also boasts Ascend D110 Lite for neural processing, utilizing HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture.
In comparison, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 consists of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This octa-core processor operates on a 16 nm lithography and has a TDP of 5 watts. With 4000 million transistors, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 has a higher transistor count compared to the Kirin 820 5G.
Both processors support the ARMv8 instruction set, enabling compatibility with a wide range of applications and software. However, the Kirin 820 5G has a more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set, while the Kirin 960 utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set.
When it comes to the Neural Processing Unit (NPU), the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G incorporates Ascend D110 Lite, which enhances its capabilities for AI-related tasks. The Kirin 960, on the other hand, does not have a dedicated NPU.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G has a more advanced architecture with a wider range of clock speeds, a more efficient lithography, and an NPU for enhanced AI capabilities. The Kirin 960, on the other hand, has a higher transistor count and a slightly lower TDP. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Number of transistors | 4000 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G71 MP8 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Execution units | 6 | 8 |
| Shaders | 96 | 128 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11.3 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 20MP, 2x 12MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.6 Gbps | 0.6 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 March | 2016 October |
| Partnumber | Hi3660 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs MediaTek Helio G36
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
3
Apple M3 (iPad) vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
5
Apple A17 Pro vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
6
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
7
Apple A16 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
8
Apple A15 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio P90
9
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
10
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 1380