HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 710 and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are two processors that offer different specifications and performance capabilities.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total number of 8 cores, this processor offers a balanced combination of power and efficiency. It utilizes an ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12nm, allowing for compact and energy-efficient design. The number of transistors is 5500 million, further contributing to its performance capabilities. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) is set at 5 Watts, indicating a low power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G also boasts an 8-core CPU architecture. It consists of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor offers a similar number of cores as the Kirin 710, but with a different mix of core types. It uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and also has a lithography of 12nm. One standout feature of the T740 5G is its inclusion of Dual Neural Processing Units (NPU), which can enhance AI and machine learning capabilities for improved performance in tasks that require AI processing.
In conclusion, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G have 8 cores and a 12nm lithography, they differ in terms of their CPU architectures and additional features. The Kirin 710 offers a mix of Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A53 cores, while the T740 5G utilizes Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. Additionally, the T740 5G stands out with its inclusion of Dual NPU for enhanced AI processing capabilities. Depending on the specific requirements of a device or application, users can choose between these processors for their unique performance needs.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total number of 8 cores, this processor offers a balanced combination of power and efficiency. It utilizes an ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12nm, allowing for compact and energy-efficient design. The number of transistors is 5500 million, further contributing to its performance capabilities. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) is set at 5 Watts, indicating a low power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G also boasts an 8-core CPU architecture. It consists of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor offers a similar number of cores as the Kirin 710, but with a different mix of core types. It uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and also has a lithography of 12nm. One standout feature of the T740 5G is its inclusion of Dual Neural Processing Units (NPU), which can enhance AI and machine learning capabilities for improved performance in tasks that require AI processing.
In conclusion, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G have 8 cores and a 12nm lithography, they differ in terms of their CPU architectures and additional features. The Kirin 710 offers a mix of Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A53 cores, while the T740 5G utilizes Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. Additionally, the T740 5G stands out with its inclusion of Dual NPU for enhanced AI processing capabilities. Depending on the specific requirements of a device or application, users can choose between these processors for their unique performance needs.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 800 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | |
Shaders | 64 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2960x1440@60Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 64MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.75 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 3 | 2020 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | T740, Tiger T7510 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Samsung Exynos 7880
2
MediaTek Helio A25 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
3
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
4
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
5
Apple A13 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
6
Apple A12 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9825
7
Apple A14 Bionic vs Unisoc Tiger T606
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
9
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1