HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Unisoc Tiger T618

The HiSilicon Kirin 810 and the Unisoc Tiger T618 are two processors with distinct specifications. Let's compare them based on their specifications.

Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 810, it is built on a 7 nm lithography process. This means that it can provide increased power efficiency and better overall performance compared to processors built on larger nodes. The Kirin 810 consists of eight cores, with a combination of 2x 2.27 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 1.88 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Cortex-A76 cores offer high-performance computing capabilities, while the Cortex-A55 cores focus on energy efficiency. The Kirin 810 also boasts an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A, which is compatible with the latest applications and software. Moreover, it includes the Ascend D100 Lite neural processing unit, incorporating Huawei's Da Vinci architecture for advanced AI capabilities. The HiSilicon Kirin 810 operates at a TDP of 5 watts and has approximately 6.9 billion transistors.

On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T618 is fabricated using a 12 nm lithography process, which is slightly less advanced than the Kirin 810. It also features eight cores, including 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Cortex-A75 cores are designed to deliver improved performance, albeit at a slightly lower clock speed. The Tiger T618 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern applications and software. In terms of neural processing, it includes an NPU to enhance AI capabilities. However, the Tiger T618 operates at a higher TDP of 10 watts compared to the Kirin 810. It should be noted that this processor contains unspecified information on the number of transistors.

In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 excels in terms of lithography, offering a more power-efficient and powerful performance compared to the Unisoc Tiger T618. Moreover, the Kirin 810's combination of Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores, along with the Huawei Da Vinci architecture, provides advanced AI capabilities. However, the Tiger T618 offers slightly higher clock speeds on its cores at the expense of higher power consumption. Overall, the choice between these processors will depend on the intended usage and individual priorities relating to power efficiency, performance, and AI capabilities.