HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
Comparing the specifications of the HiSilicon Kirin 810 and the Unisoc Tiger T310 processors, it is evident that there are notable differences between the two.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 comes with a more advanced setup. It features 2x 2.27 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 1.88 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling eight CPU cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T310 has a less powerful structure with only 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, resulting in a total of four CPU cores.
Moving to the instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, indicating compatibility with modern software and technology.
In terms of lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 stands out as it utilizes a more advanced 7nm process, which offers superior efficiency and performance compared to the 12nm process used by the Unisoc Tiger T310.
Furthermore, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 impresses with its higher transistor count of 6900 million, indicating a more complex and capable hardware design. In contrast, the Unisoc Tiger T310's transistor count remains unspecified.
Lastly, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 specifies a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, which indicates its ability to operate at lower power consumption levels, potentially leading to increased battery life. The TDP of the Unisoc Tiger T310, however, is not provided.
Although both processors showcase some similarities, such as their ARMv8.2-A instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 emerges as the more powerful and technologically advanced option. Its higher number of CPU cores, use of a superior 7nm lithography, larger transistor count, and specified lower TDP make it favorable in terms of performance and energy efficiency.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 surpasses the Unisoc Tiger T310 in multiple aspects and can provide users with a more comprehensive and advanced processing experience.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 comes with a more advanced setup. It features 2x 2.27 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 1.88 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling eight CPU cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T310 has a less powerful structure with only 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, resulting in a total of four CPU cores.
Moving to the instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, indicating compatibility with modern software and technology.
In terms of lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 stands out as it utilizes a more advanced 7nm process, which offers superior efficiency and performance compared to the 12nm process used by the Unisoc Tiger T310.
Furthermore, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 impresses with its higher transistor count of 6900 million, indicating a more complex and capable hardware design. In contrast, the Unisoc Tiger T310's transistor count remains unspecified.
Lastly, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 specifies a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, which indicates its ability to operate at lower power consumption levels, potentially leading to increased battery life. The TDP of the Unisoc Tiger T310, however, is not provided.
Although both processors showcase some similarities, such as their ARMv8.2-A instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 emerges as the more powerful and technologically advanced option. Its higher number of CPU cores, use of a superior 7nm lithography, larger transistor count, and specified lower TDP make it favorable in terms of performance and energy efficiency.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 810 surpasses the Unisoc Tiger T310 in multiple aspects and can provide users with a more comprehensive and advanced processing experience.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 1.88 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D100 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1333 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G52 MP6 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 820 MHz | 660 MHz |
| Execution units | 6 | 2 |
| Shaders | 96 | 32 |
| DirectX | 12 | 10 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1600x720 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 2 | 2019 April |
| Partnumber | Hi6280 | T310 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A10 Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
2
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Unisoc SC9832E
4
HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs Apple A15 Bionic
6
MediaTek Dimensity 9400e vs MediaTek Helio G96
7
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs MediaTek Helio G100
8
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs MediaTek Helio P90
9
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
10
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030