HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 710F and the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G are both processors used in mobile devices. While they share some similarities, they also have notable differences in their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710F, it features a CPU architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a balance between high-performance and power efficiency. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. Additionally, it boasts a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, indicating its power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G showcases some interesting specifications as well. Its CPU architecture comprises 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, offering a similar balance of performance and efficiency. Like the Kirin 710F, it also has 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Tanggula T760 has a lower lithography of 6 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process. Furthermore, it has the added feature of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances artificial intelligence capabilities.
Comparing the two processors, it is clear that they both offer a balanced combination of performance and power efficiency with their respective CPU architecture. However, the Tanggula T760 has the advantage of a more advanced manufacturing process with its 6 nm lithography, potentially providing improved efficiency and performance. Additionally, the inclusion of an NPU in the Tanggula T760 enhances its AI capabilities, offering faster and more efficient neural processing tasks.
In conclusion, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 710F and the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G have similar core configurations and TDPs, the Tanggula T760 boasts a more advanced lithography and the added bonus of an NPU. These specifications make it a potentially more powerful and capable processor in comparison to the Kirin 710F.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710F, it features a CPU architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a balance between high-performance and power efficiency. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. Additionally, it boasts a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, indicating its power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G showcases some interesting specifications as well. Its CPU architecture comprises 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, offering a similar balance of performance and efficiency. Like the Kirin 710F, it also has 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Tanggula T760 has a lower lithography of 6 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process. Furthermore, it has the added feature of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances artificial intelligence capabilities.
Comparing the two processors, it is clear that they both offer a balanced combination of performance and power efficiency with their respective CPU architecture. However, the Tanggula T760 has the advantage of a more advanced manufacturing process with its 6 nm lithography, potentially providing improved efficiency and performance. Additionally, the inclusion of an NPU in the Tanggula T760 enhances its AI capabilities, offering faster and more efficient neural processing tasks.
In conclusion, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 710F and the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G have similar core configurations and TDPs, the Tanggula T760 boasts a more advanced lithography and the added bonus of an NPU. These specifications make it a potentially more powerful and capable processor in comparison to the Kirin 710F.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 6 |
Shaders | 64 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 1 | 2021 February |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | T760 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
2
MediaTek Helio P35 vs Samsung Exynos 1330
3
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
4
Unisoc SC9832E vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs MediaTek Helio P60
6
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
7
MediaTek Helio G90 vs MediaTek Helio G85
8
Unisoc SC7731E vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
9
Samsung Exynos 990 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
10
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Samsung Exynos 9609