HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
The HiSilicon Kirin 810 and MediaTek Dimensity 800U are two processors that are often compared due to their similar specifications. Let's take a closer look at each processor's specifications to see how they differ.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 810, it is built on a 7 nm lithography process and features 8 CPU cores. Its architecture consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.27 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.88 GHz. With the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, this processor offers efficient performance for various tasks. The Kirin 810 also boasts a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) called Ascend D100 Lite, which utilizes HUAWEI's Da Vinci Architecture for advanced AI processing. With a TDP of 5 Watts, it provides a balance between power and energy efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U shares some similarities. It also utilizes the 7 nm lithography process and features 8 CPU cores. Its architecture comprises 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at a higher frequency of 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Like the Kirin 810, it uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Dimensity 800U does not mention a specific NPU, only noting that it has an NPU for Neural Processing.
Based on these specifications, both processors offer excellent performance capabilities. The Kirin 810 has a wider range of CPU frequencies, which may provide better versatility for different tasks. Additionally, its dedicated NPU with HUAWEI's Da Vinci Architecture could lead to superior AI processing. On the other hand, the Dimensity 800U's higher clock speed for its Cortex-A76 cores suggests potentially better single-threaded performance.
In conclusion, while the HiSilicon Kirin 810 and MediaTek Dimensity 800U share many similarities in terms of lithography, CPU cores, and instruction set, there are slight differences in their architecture and neural processing capabilities. Users can consider their specific requirements and preferences to choose the processor that best suits their needs.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 810, it is built on a 7 nm lithography process and features 8 CPU cores. Its architecture consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.27 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.88 GHz. With the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, this processor offers efficient performance for various tasks. The Kirin 810 also boasts a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) called Ascend D100 Lite, which utilizes HUAWEI's Da Vinci Architecture for advanced AI processing. With a TDP of 5 Watts, it provides a balance between power and energy efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U shares some similarities. It also utilizes the 7 nm lithography process and features 8 CPU cores. Its architecture comprises 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at a higher frequency of 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Like the Kirin 810, it uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Dimensity 800U does not mention a specific NPU, only noting that it has an NPU for Neural Processing.
Based on these specifications, both processors offer excellent performance capabilities. The Kirin 810 has a wider range of CPU frequencies, which may provide better versatility for different tasks. Additionally, its dedicated NPU with HUAWEI's Da Vinci Architecture could lead to superior AI processing. On the other hand, the Dimensity 800U's higher clock speed for its Cortex-A76 cores suggests potentially better single-threaded performance.
In conclusion, while the HiSilicon Kirin 810 and MediaTek Dimensity 800U share many similarities in terms of lithography, CPU cores, and instruction set, there are slight differences in their architecture and neural processing capabilities. Users can consider their specific requirements and preferences to choose the processor that best suits their needs.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 1.88 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Ascend D100 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G52 MP6 | Mali-G57 MP3 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 820 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | 3 |
Shaders | 96 | 48 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | 4K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 2 | 2020 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | Hi6280 | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
2
Apple A17 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 7904
3
MediaTek Helio P70 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs MediaTek Helio G90
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
6
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
7
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
8
Samsung Exynos 850 vs MediaTek Helio G37
9
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
10
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000