HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
The HiSilicon Kirin 810 and the MediaTek Dimensity 700 are two processors that offer competitive specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 810, it features an architecture consisting of 2x 2.27 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 1.88 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor provides a balance between high-performance and power efficiency. The Kirin 810 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is manufactured on a 7 nm lithography. It boasts a significant number of transistors, totaling 6900 million. Additionally, it has a low TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, indicating efficient power consumption. The Kirin 810 also features neural processing capabilities through the Ascend D100 Lite with HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, enhancing its AI capabilities.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 700, it shares similarities with the Kirin 810 in terms of key specifications. The Dimensity 700 also employs the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has an identical 7 nm lithography. It is equipped with 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, resulting in a similar octa-core configuration. However, it does differ in terms of TDP, with a slightly higher value of 10 Watts.
Both processors offer efficient power consumption and promising performance with their octa-core architecture. The Kirin 810, with its Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores, provides a slightly higher clock speed for its high-performance cores compared to the Dimensity 700. On the other hand, the Dimensity 700 offers a higher clock speed for all of its cores, which could potentially result in improved overall performance.
Ultimately, the choice between the HiSilicon Kirin 810 and the MediaTek Dimensity 700 would depend on specific requirements and preferences. Some factors to consider would include the desired balance between power efficiency and performance, as well as the specific AI capabilities offered by the processors.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 810, it features an architecture consisting of 2x 2.27 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 1.88 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor provides a balance between high-performance and power efficiency. The Kirin 810 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is manufactured on a 7 nm lithography. It boasts a significant number of transistors, totaling 6900 million. Additionally, it has a low TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, indicating efficient power consumption. The Kirin 810 also features neural processing capabilities through the Ascend D100 Lite with HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, enhancing its AI capabilities.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 700, it shares similarities with the Kirin 810 in terms of key specifications. The Dimensity 700 also employs the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has an identical 7 nm lithography. It is equipped with 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, resulting in a similar octa-core configuration. However, it does differ in terms of TDP, with a slightly higher value of 10 Watts.
Both processors offer efficient power consumption and promising performance with their octa-core architecture. The Kirin 810, with its Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores, provides a slightly higher clock speed for its high-performance cores compared to the Dimensity 700. On the other hand, the Dimensity 700 offers a higher clock speed for all of its cores, which could potentially result in improved overall performance.
Ultimately, the choice between the HiSilicon Kirin 810 and the MediaTek Dimensity 700 would depend on specific requirements and preferences. Some factors to consider would include the desired balance between power efficiency and performance, as well as the specific AI capabilities offered by the processors.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 1.88 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D100 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G52 MP6 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 820 MHz | 950 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | 2 |
Shaders | 96 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | 2K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 2 | 2021 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | Hi6280 | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
2
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
3
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
4
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
8
MediaTek Helio G37 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
9
MediaTek Helio P35 vs MediaTek Helio G36
10
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Apple A15 Bionic