HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
When comparing the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and Unisoc Tiger T710 processors, it is clear that they both possess similar features. However, there are some notable differences in their specifications that set them apart.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it is equipped with a total of eight cores, divided into two clusters. The first cluster consists of four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, while the second cluster contains four Cortex-A53 cores running at 1.7 GHz. This architecture allows for efficient multitasking and power management. The Kirin 710 uses the ARMv8-A instruction set, offering advanced features and capabilities. With a 12 nm lithography process and 5500 million transistors, this processor delivers excellent performance. Additionally, it operates at a TDP of 5 Watts, ensuring optimal power consumption for mobile devices.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 also features eight cores, divided into two clusters. The first cluster contains four Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz, while the second cluster consists of four Cortex-A55 cores also running at 1.8 GHz. This architecture provides a balance between performance and power efficiency. The Tiger T710 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, offering additional features compared to the Kirin 710. With a 12 nm lithography process, it offers comparable efficiency to the Kirin 710. Furthermore, the Tiger T710 includes dual neural processing units (NPU), which enhances its AI capabilities.
In summary, both processors offer similar core configurations and lithography capabilities. However, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 has a higher clock speed for its primary cores, while the Unisoc Tiger T710 features a newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set and dual NPUs for enhanced AI processing. The choice between the two processors ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the device and its intended usage.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it is equipped with a total of eight cores, divided into two clusters. The first cluster consists of four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, while the second cluster contains four Cortex-A53 cores running at 1.7 GHz. This architecture allows for efficient multitasking and power management. The Kirin 710 uses the ARMv8-A instruction set, offering advanced features and capabilities. With a 12 nm lithography process and 5500 million transistors, this processor delivers excellent performance. Additionally, it operates at a TDP of 5 Watts, ensuring optimal power consumption for mobile devices.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 also features eight cores, divided into two clusters. The first cluster contains four Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz, while the second cluster consists of four Cortex-A55 cores also running at 1.8 GHz. This architecture provides a balance between performance and power efficiency. The Tiger T710 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, offering additional features compared to the Kirin 710. With a 12 nm lithography process, it offers comparable efficiency to the Kirin 710. Furthermore, the Tiger T710 includes dual neural processing units (NPU), which enhances its AI capabilities.
In summary, both processors offer similar core configurations and lithography capabilities. However, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 has a higher clock speed for its primary cores, while the Unisoc Tiger T710 features a newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set and dual NPUs for enhanced AI processing. The choice between the two processors ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the device and its intended usage.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 800 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | |
Shaders | 64 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 3 | 2019 |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | T710 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
2
MediaTek Helio G25 vs MediaTek Helio P95
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
4
MediaTek Helio P60 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
5
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
6
Apple A17 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
7
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Apple A15 Bionic
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
9
MediaTek Helio G80 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
10
Apple A10 Fusion vs Samsung Exynos 9820