HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
The HiSilicon Kirin 710 and the Unisoc Tiger T606 are two processors that can be compared based on their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it has a CPU architecture consisting of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This gives it a total of eight cores for processing tasks. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography size of 12 nm. In terms of the number of transistors, it houses 5,500 million. The thermal design power (TDP) for this processor is relatively low at 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T606 also features eight cores for processing. Its CPU architecture consists of 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 710, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography size of 12 nm. In terms of the number of transistors, specific information is not mentioned. However, it has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts compared to the Kirin 710.
In comparing these two processors, both have eight cores for processing, but their specific architectures differ. The Kirin 710 has a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A73 cores (2.2 GHz) compared to the Tiger T606's Cortex-A75 cores (1.6 GHz). However, the Tiger T606 has a higher number of Cortex-A55 cores (6) compared to the Kirin 710's Cortex-A53 cores (4). Both processors operate on ARM instruction sets and have the same lithography size.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 710 has a lower TDP (5 Watts) compared to the Tiger T606 (10 Watts).
Overall, these processors have their own strengths and weaknesses based on their specifications. The Kirin 710 may excel in tasks that require higher clock speeds, while the Tiger T606 may perform better in multi-threaded workloads with its higher number of lower clocked cores. Choice of processor may depend on specific use cases and requirements.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it has a CPU architecture consisting of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This gives it a total of eight cores for processing tasks. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography size of 12 nm. In terms of the number of transistors, it houses 5,500 million. The thermal design power (TDP) for this processor is relatively low at 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T606 also features eight cores for processing. Its CPU architecture consists of 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 710, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography size of 12 nm. In terms of the number of transistors, specific information is not mentioned. However, it has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts compared to the Kirin 710.
In comparing these two processors, both have eight cores for processing, but their specific architectures differ. The Kirin 710 has a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A73 cores (2.2 GHz) compared to the Tiger T606's Cortex-A75 cores (1.6 GHz). However, the Tiger T606 has a higher number of Cortex-A55 cores (6) compared to the Kirin 710's Cortex-A53 cores (4). Both processors operate on ARM instruction sets and have the same lithography size.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 710 has a lower TDP (5 Watts) compared to the Tiger T606 (10 Watts).
Overall, these processors have their own strengths and weaknesses based on their specifications. The Kirin 710 may excel in tasks that require higher clock speeds, while the Tiger T606 may perform better in multi-threaded workloads with its higher number of lower clocked cores. Choice of processor may depend on specific use cases and requirements.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 1600x900@90Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 3 | 2021 October |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | T606 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
2
Samsung Exynos 990 vs MediaTek Helio P90
3
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
4
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs MediaTek Helio P35
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
7
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
8
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Apple A13 Bionic
9
MediaTek Helio G90T vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
10
Unisoc SC7731E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636